Expert Opinion

How Landlords Can Address Eviction Moratoriums for Commercial Tenants During the Pandemic

Landlords must navigate local, state and federal restrictions on traditional enforcement mechanism available to address nonpayment of rent under their lease and Florida law.

May 19, 2020 at 10:09 AM

4 minute read


 

Avi Tryson.Coral Gables Managing Partner.Goede, Adamczyk, DeBoest & Cross.Coral Gables Avi Tryson. Coral Gables managing partner, Goede, Adamczyk, DeBoest & Cross

The pandemic is having a major impact on business finances and the greater economy. With many businesses operating with reduced hours or closing indefinitely, many commercial real estate tenants are already feeling financial strain. As a result, many tenants may not pay their rent on time. Landlords need cash flow to pay employees and vendors and to keep operating and maintaining the property. At the same time, landlords must navigate local, state and federal restrictions on traditional enforcement mechanism available to address nonpayment of rent under their lease and Florida law.

At the time of this writing, there is no federal restriction on evictions. Florida's governor issued an executive order suspending and tolling residential evictions for nonpayment until May 18. The executive order does not apply to commercial evictions.

However, on March 16, the Miami-Dade Police Department suspended the enforcement of all writs of possession until further notice, and on March 18, the Florida Supreme Court followed suit and suspended the issuance of writs of possession throughout the state until April 17, which was later extended to June 2.

Without being able to obtain or enforce writes of possession, landlords cannot legally repossess their property. Because this is a fluid situation, there is no way to know if these restrictions will be extended for a longer duration of time. Accordingly, landlords must monitor temporary changes in policies enacted at all levels of government in response to the pandemic.

Landlords should also be cognizant of the financial struggles that some tenants will experience and consider approaching rent collection with a certain amount of reasonableness and understanding. Major retailers and restaurant chains across the country, such as Cheesecake Factory, Staples and Urban Outfitters, have notified their landlords that they are not able to pay any rent as a result of the pandemic. Landlords are in the unenviable position of having to choose between evicting important longtime tenants or accept a waiver, reduction, or deferral of rent.

Landlords should address rent nonpayment on a case-by-case basis. Not all tenants are facing financial difficulties, and some may be trying to take advantage of the current situation. Landlords should inform such tenants that they are required to abide by the terms of their lease and, if you choose to provide relief, that rent will only be addressed after the tenant has provided sufficient financial documentation showing how the tenant has been affected by the pandemic, including the disclosure of any relief they have requested and received from the government. Where the tenant is a franchisee, the financial documentation should be limited to that specific location.

Before reaching any agreement with a tenant, landlords should have an attorney review the lease and advise them of the strengths and weaknesses of the different legal options available to them. If the landlord decides that an accommodation is in its best interest, an amendment to the lease should be drafted to memorialize in writing the agreed upon terms, and such amendment should be reviewed and approved by the tenant's counsel. If the tenant elects to not have counsel review the amendment on their behalf, then make sure that you have provided the tenant with sufficient time to review the amendment, and the amendment includes language that the tenant had sufficient time and the opportunity to obtain counsel to review the amendment.

As with most landlord-tenant situations, knowledgeable legal counsel is indispensable in navigating the myriad legal issues that may arise, but in light of the pandemic, it is more important than ever to make sure that you are represented by qualified counsel.

Avi S. Tryson is the Coral Gables managing partner of Goede, Adamczyk, DeBoest & Cross. He focuses his practice on community association and real estate law.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Go To Lexis →

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Go To Bloomberg Law →

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

NOT FOR REPRINT

Latest
Trending

Who Got The Work

J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.

Read More

Law.com Pro

    More from ALM