Florida Law Firm Facing Malpractice Suit for Allegedly Targeting Wrong Defendant
This legal malpractice lawsuit in Miami-Dade Circuit Court alleges mistakes made early in a case blocked a plaintiff from recovering $750,000 in damages and $430,000 in prejudgment interest.
May 21, 2020 at 01:04 PM
3 minute read
A lawsuit over unpaid commission from a Tallahassee real estate deal has spiraled into a legal malpractice case in Miami-Dade Circuit Court, where a disgruntled former client alleges its lawyers wasted valuable time by suing the wrong defendants.
Evan H. Frederick of Morgan & Morgan's Business Trial Group in West Palm Beach represents plaintiff Plaza Tower Realty Group LLC, which hired Tallahassee real estate, family and business law firm Boyd & Durant P.L. in August 2009 to recover $750,000 for its work securing buyers for a high-rise condominium building.
But although the firm did file suit, it allegedly went after the wrong parties — a mistake the complaint claims proved fatal down the line.
Defendants Boyd & Durant and two of its partners, Joseph Durant and James Boyd, did not respond to a request for comment by deadline. No attorney has entered an appearance for them, according to online case files.
The complaint is not visible online, pending review for redaction. However, the Daily Business Review obtained a copy, which plaintiffs attorney Frederick confirmed is the same as the one filed.
|'Too little, too late'
The lawsuit claims Boyd & Durant sued the project's developer and escrow agent instead of its lender, Union Labor Life Insurance Co., and its subsidiary, 300 South Duval Associates LLC, which had actually received and held the money the plaintiff was contesting.
The correct parties only made it onto the lawsuit four and half years later when Plaza Tower Realty hired new lawyers, according to the complaint. And after a trial in November 2019, jurors found those claims had no legs because they were filed outside of a four-year statute of limitations.
"By the time our client was able to add the proper parties to their lawsuit, it was too little too late," Frederick said. "As a result of their alleged failure, Plaza Tower Realty could not recover the $750,000 in damages it was awarded by the jury, plus more than $430,000 in prejudgment interest."
The complaint alleges at least one attorney knew who the correct parties were by September 2009, but instead of adding them as defendants reportedly reached an "informal agreement" with the escrow agent's lawyer to stay the litigation until a related foreclosure suit against the developer had concluded.
"An attorney's most basic task is to file a client's claim in a timely manner," Frederick said. "We allege the defendants were negligent in performing their duties while representing Plaza Tower Realty and wasted precious time in going after the wrong entities."
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Alan Fine will preside over the lawsuit, which accuses the defendants of professional negligence and breach of fiduciary duty.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApplying Neuroscience to Real Estate Development to Address Our Growing Need for Improved Well-Being
10 minute readReal Estate Trends to Watch in 2025: Restructuring, Growth, and Challenges in South Florida
3 minute readAfter Miami Arrest, Top Real Estate Broker Brothers Facing Sex Crimes Charges
Trending Stories
- 1As 'Red Hot' 2024 for Legal Industry Comes to Close, Leaders Reflect and Share Expectations for Next Year
- 2Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 3Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 4Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 5Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250