South Florida Skater Gets Second Chance to Sue County After Falling in 'Deep Hole'
The appellate panel revived this lawsuit after finding the defendant's prevailing argument came too late and that the plaintiff was wrongly blocked from amending her complaint.
May 21, 2020 at 06:22 PM
3 minute read
A woman who fell into a "deep hole" while rollerblading on a Palm Beach County path got a second chance at suing the local government Wednesday, when the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed a summary judgment over procedural issues.
The case demonstrates how early slipups could later become big headaches for litigants.
Plaintiff Emma Griffin was skating alongside Camino Del Mar Road in Boca Raton in February 2017, when she claims she pivoted to let a family pass by her. But what she couldn't see, according to the lawsuit, was that overgrown vegetation had masked a hole on the edge of the county-owned asphalt path, which resulted in a nasty fall.
Griffin sued in March 2018, alleging negligence and failure to repair a dangerous condition.
Defendant Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners denied any wrongdoing, and later sought a summary judgment, arguing it was immune from liability because skating was not allowed on that path under Florida Statute Section 316.0085(4).
Palm Beach Circuit Judge James Nutt agreed.
But that was the wrong call, according to the Fourth DCA, because the county never included that argument in its affirmative defenses at trial.
Griffin was also denied the chance to add a "discovered or known trespasser" theory to her complaint, which could make the county liable if it knew people frequently skirted the law, and didn't act.
That request should have been granted, according to the appellate panel, which pointed to case law that says amendments should be approved unless they would prejudice the other party, the privilege has been abused or it would have no real consequence.
"Since the county had not filed the statute as an affirmative defense, Griffin had no opportunity to respond to it by amendment of her pleadings," the opinion said. "Because of this, we cannot say that the amendment would have been futile. She should have had the opportunity to amend."
Fourth DCA Judge Martha Warner wrote the ruling, backed by Mark Klingensmith and Jeffrey Kuntz. They noted the defense also has the same right to amend its affirmative defenses.
Assistant Palm Beach County attorneys Chelsea J. Koester and Sara C. Lindsey in West Palm Beach declined to comment, citing office policy. Sorraya M. Solages-Jones of Lytal, Reiter, Smith, Ivey & Fronrath in West Palm Beach represent the plaintiff and did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
|Read the opinion:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCOVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Year-End Tax Planning: How Real Estate Investors Can Leverage Qualified Opportunity Funds
5 minute read'Horror of Horrors': Florida Judges Spar Over En Banc Review in Binance Ruling
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Prior Inconsistent Statements and Medical Malpractice Defense
- 2Public Interest Calendar of Events
- 3Why Law Firms Should Focus on IA for Improved Gen AI
- 4Post-Pandemic Increase in Live Events Prompts Need for Premise Liability Action
- 5Companies' Dirty Little Secret: Those Privacy Opt-Out Requests Usually Aren't Honored
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250