South Florida Skater Gets Second Chance to Sue County After Falling in 'Deep Hole'
The appellate panel revived this lawsuit after finding the defendant's prevailing argument came too late and that the plaintiff was wrongly blocked from amending her complaint.
May 21, 2020 at 06:22 PM
3 minute read
A woman who fell into a "deep hole" while rollerblading on a Palm Beach County path got a second chance at suing the local government Wednesday, when the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed a summary judgment over procedural issues.
The case demonstrates how early slipups could later become big headaches for litigants.
Plaintiff Emma Griffin was skating alongside Camino Del Mar Road in Boca Raton in February 2017, when she claims she pivoted to let a family pass by her. But what she couldn't see, according to the lawsuit, was that overgrown vegetation had masked a hole on the edge of the county-owned asphalt path, which resulted in a nasty fall.
Griffin sued in March 2018, alleging negligence and failure to repair a dangerous condition.
Defendant Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners denied any wrongdoing, and later sought a summary judgment, arguing it was immune from liability because skating was not allowed on that path under Florida Statute Section 316.0085(4).
Palm Beach Circuit Judge James Nutt agreed.
But that was the wrong call, according to the Fourth DCA, because the county never included that argument in its affirmative defenses at trial.
Griffin was also denied the chance to add a "discovered or known trespasser" theory to her complaint, which could make the county liable if it knew people frequently skirted the law, and didn't act.
That request should have been granted, according to the appellate panel, which pointed to case law that says amendments should be approved unless they would prejudice the other party, the privilege has been abused or it would have no real consequence.
"Since the county had not filed the statute as an affirmative defense, Griffin had no opportunity to respond to it by amendment of her pleadings," the opinion said. "Because of this, we cannot say that the amendment would have been futile. She should have had the opportunity to amend."
Fourth DCA Judge Martha Warner wrote the ruling, backed by Mark Klingensmith and Jeffrey Kuntz. They noted the defense also has the same right to amend its affirmative defenses.
Assistant Palm Beach County attorneys Chelsea J. Koester and Sara C. Lindsey in West Palm Beach declined to comment, citing office policy. Sorraya M. Solages-Jones of Lytal, Reiter, Smith, Ivey & Fronrath in West Palm Beach represent the plaintiff and did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Read the opinion:
Read more:
Florida Law Firm Facing Malpractice Suit for Allegedly Targeting Wrong Defendant
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readAs Unpredictability Rises, Gov't Law Practices Expect Trump Bump. Especially in Florida
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250