Law Firms Use Tech to Keep Up With COVID-19 Reopening Mandates
Law firms like Akerman are investing in back to work information technology to keep clients up to date as pandemic restrictions are eased.
May 26, 2020 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
Law firms tracking revisions in COVID-19 government restrictions during the reopening phase view tech-based solutions as their best bet for keeping clients up to date about changes dropping on what seems like a daily basis.
"All clients are probably struggling with a lot of the same challenges — strategically, operationally and legally — for planning to reopen," said Akerman partner Beth Alcalde in West Palm Beach, the firm's Return to Work team leader. She specializes in employee benefits.
In response, the team launched a Return to Work Resource Guide, which is a client-facing web portal containing policies, questionnaires, procedures and other documents to transition workers back to work.
To be sure, some law firms were already leveraging technology to address the coronavirus pandemic's business impact as travel bans and stay-at-home mandates were issued. Some initially questioned whether client-facing portals were useful or simply marketing tools.
But Elizabeth Espín Stern, a Mayer Brown partner and member of the firm's COVID-19 global response team, said technology is a useful tool for easily sharing with clients the restrictions of a lifted shutdown and how the mandate impacts their industry. She leads the firm's global mobility and migration practice in Washington.
Mayer Brown released its Global Traveler Navigator to track travel shutdowns issued by governments to stem coronavirus spread and other web tools to assist clients.
The firm followed up the first navigator with April's Global Stimulus Navigator, an analysis of major economic stimulus measures, and Back to Business Navigator, an interactive map illustrating state and county restrictions for specific industries.
Stern noted the Back to Business Navigator was needed to deliver reliable, consistent and "easy-to-digest information to clients because they were starting to look at a multitude of issues."
She also said the firm views public reopening mandates as announcements that can be easily revoked if COVID-19 begins to spread again in specific places. As such, the tech platform is a useful tool to keep clients updated about quick-changing requirements.
Kimball Parker, president of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati's software developer subsidiary SixFifty, agreed shutdown reversals are being introduced rapidly and can be expensive for companies to understand and respond to.
"A company could spend tens of thousands of dollars on an assessment and within a week the policy could be out of date and the assessment is moot based on developments," Parker said. "This is not a situation catered to a static document, and with technology you can update things and blast it to a bunch of users. That makes so much sense in this situation."
While SixFifty released two web-based tools to assist companies working during shutdowns, Parker noted the company also developed automated assessments and policies for companies bringing employees back to work.
Those documents include a return-to-work assessment and policy, a daily employee ready-and-willing to return to work survey and a daily employee questionnaire to ensure infected employees don't come to work.
Though SixFifty leveraged technology and WIlson Sonsini employment lawyers' expertise to develop automated assessments and policies, Parker noted COVID-19 is an unprecedented event that no company or general counsel can compare to.
"This has never happened before, and so what that means is the attorney has to generate that document from scratch, and that dramatically increases the cost as opposed to working from a template. That makes it really expensive," he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘What’s Up With Morgan & Morgan?’ Law, Advertising and a Calculated Rise
10 minute readGrowing Referral Network, Alternative Fees Have This Ex-Big Law’s Atty’s Bankruptcy Practice Soaring
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Business Breakups: Why Business and Commercial Cases Are Well-Suited to Mediation
- 2Prosecutors Drop Charges Against Ex-Miami Commissioner and Attorney
- 3Pennsylvania Modernizes Trust Administration With New Directed Trust Statute
- 4Farella Hires Former AUSA, Jan. 6 Prosecutor
- 5Dougherty Jury Returns $2M Verdict
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250