5 South Florida Lawyers Disciplined by State Supreme Court
The Florida Supreme Court disciplined 11 attorneys, including five from South Florida, over ethics violations between April 16 and May 21.
May 28, 2020 at 04:58 PM
4 minute read
Lawyer facing the scales of justice. Photo: Lightspring/Shutterstock.com
The COVID-19 pandemic didn't stop the Florida Supreme Court from clamping down on 11 attorneys over ethics violations between April 16 and May 21 — five of whom were from South Florida, according to information released Thursday.
Miami appellate attorney Rafael Angel Castro was disbarred over allegations he neglected two clients' cases for years, repeatedly seeking extensions with late filings and allegedly failing to refund fees.
Florida Justices declined to implement a recommended 18-month suspension and ordered Castro to pay $21,000 in restitution to the clients and $4,300 in costs to the bar. Castro disputed the accuracy of the referee's findings but filed his response late. He was admitted to the bar in 1995 and his disbarment will take effect 30 days from the May 21 court order.
Castro said he felt he was denied due process in a "railroading process" that has made him "no longer proud to be a Florida lawyer." He urged readers to look at his filings, claiming the bar initially offered him a 12-months suspension if he pleaded guilty.
"I denied the Florida Bar's offer and, now, ludicrously, I am being disbarred (i) in respect of the Gordon case, for having untimely filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus – one of my best legal writings — arguing that the law ought to be changed to allow the Florida Supreme Court to use mandamus as a means of supervising the Florida courts of appeals, since certiorari does not exist; and (ii) in the Tilley case, for having untimely filed briefs that were accepted by the Second Court of Appeal, a court which issued a per curiam affirmed opinion after holding oral argument. This usually does not happen," Castro said. "I was blamed also in Tilley for having a headache prior to oral argument and admitting to it, since I drove all night to get to Tampa for that proceeding."
The Florida Supreme also disregarded recommendations that West Palm Beach lawyer Rita Horwitz Altman receive a public reprimand and five years probation, opting instead to suspend her for three years. The Florida Bar accused Horwitz of failing to respond to its inquiries about a grievance filed against her, and of lying to bar investigators and the Supreme Court.
At a hearing before the referee, Horwitz claimed she had been out of town for her son's heart surgery but had returned in time to receive the letter, which she put on her "list of things to get done," according to the state Supreme Court's ruling. Altman was admitted to the bar in 1992 and this is her fourth discipline case, according to the bar.
Miami immigration attorney Troy Donahue Harris has been suspended for 60 days over claims his neglect caused a client's immigration petition to be abandoned and that he filed petitions for which he knew his client was ineligible. The client was ultimately removed in absentia from the U.S., according to the bar. Donahue was admitted to practice in 1997.
Coral Gables attorney Jon B. Lindeman Jr. agreed to a disciplinary revocation that will allow him to reapply to the bar in five years, following multiple bar complaints against him alleging lack of diligence, communication, excessive fees and failure to supervise nonlawyers. Lindeman, admitted to the bar in 1999, also reportedly failed to respond to several bar inquires and subpoenas.
In his petition, Lindeman agreed to an audit of his trust account to reimburse the bar's costs and fees relating to his misconduct.
Hollywood lawyer Janet Peralta Lucente received a 30-day suspension after she was held in contempt from a court order for allegedly failing to let clients, lawyers and tribunals know about her suspension. The high court originally suspended Lucente in November 2019 for failing to respond to a bar inquiry. The attorney was admitted to practice in 1997.
Read more:
Miami Judge Facing Ethics Charges Over TV Show Claims JQC Violated First Amendment
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Florida Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss in $150M Plane Crash Lawsuit Involving Flow La Movie Florida Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss in $150M Plane Crash Lawsuit Involving Flow La Movie](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/18/1b/6bd668a742d2b7c52a213921ac7b/bucciero-gorwitz-cid-767x633.jpg)
Florida Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss in $150M Plane Crash Lawsuit Involving Flow La Movie
3 minute read![Heir Cut: Florida Appellate Court Backs Garth Reeves' Will Heir Cut: Florida Appellate Court Backs Garth Reeves' Will](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/1a/5a/54f1609943889700618e7b8cd244/shaw-wilder-robinson-767x633.jpg)
![Holland & Knight Expands Corporate Practice in Texas With Former Greenberg Traurig Partner Holland & Knight Expands Corporate Practice in Texas With Former Greenberg Traurig Partner](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/cd/e5/cb5a9afd423bb775415c5ba8a0e4/ronald-skloss-767x633.jpg)
Holland & Knight Expands Corporate Practice in Texas With Former Greenberg Traurig Partner
3 minute read![Forum Clause Axes $844M Case Against Reinsurer Over Deadly Plane Crash, Judge Rules Forum Clause Axes $844M Case Against Reinsurer Over Deadly Plane Crash, Judge Rules](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/dailybusinessreview/contrib/content/uploads/sites/414/2024/08/International-View.jpeg-image767x633cropped.jpg)
Forum Clause Axes $844M Case Against Reinsurer Over Deadly Plane Crash, Judge Rules
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250