Should I Take the Economic Injury Disaster Loan? It's a Hard Maybe for Me.
Like for many other small businesses, revenues started to slow down, while expenses remained the same or increased. We had to buy new equipment and software that would facilitate working remotely.
May 28, 2020 at 09:56 AM
7 minute read
In early March, right before our worlds turned upside down, I was busy working with my marketing team on our new website. While the new website was being built, we created a temporary landing page for immediate access to important tools such as our client portal and online appointment scheduling tool. Clients who prefer to send their documents electronically or those who don't have time for an office visit use the portal to get their taxes done remotely.
On the other hand, we also have many clients who prefer to come into the office to get their taxes filed in person. Either way—our goal is to make it easy. "Let's put the booking tool front and center so clients can quickly find it and schedule their appointments." I recall instructing the design team.
Just three or four days later, I emailed again "Abort! Abort! Abort! No in-office appointments!! Please only show the option for virtual meetings." Everything was starting to shut down due to COVID-19, and it seems like all of our daily lives changed overnight.
Like for many other small businesses, revenues started to slow down, while expenses remained the same or increased. We had to buy new equipment and software that would facilitate working remotely.
I am a CPA who practices what I preach, so we had funds set aside for emergencies, but for a global pandemic with no end date in sight? I don't think anyone could have planned for the financial impact that COVID-19 has had on small businesses. So, when we small business owners started hearing about loans and "grants" for small businesses, we all jumped on the opportunity for this "free money."
But as most us of know, there is no such thing as "free money. There is ALWAYS a cost. The question is "Is the cost worth it?"
I applied for the Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) on March 31. Days turned into weeks and I still had not heard anything about my application. Finally, on May 3, I received an email stating that my loan is being processed. Then on May 17, I got the notification that my application had been approved.
A big sigh of relief … that was short-lived. Why? I read the fine print!
- One of the attractive parts about the EIDL is that you do not have to make your first payment until 12 months from when you receive the funds. During that time, interest is accruing and, as with most loans, your payments first go to accrued interest and then toward principal. But here is where it gets weird. The payment terms go on to read "Each payment will be made when due even if at that time the full amount of the loan has not yet been advanced or the authorized amount of the loan has been reduced." Come again? So not only is there a possibility that I may not get the entire loan right away, but I have to make the payments when they are due even if I have not received the full amount of the loan by then?
- About collateral, the SBA website states "given the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic and its economic impacts, the SBA will make reasonable efforts to work with applicants toward a favorable decision," however, the loan agreement states the following about collateral: For loans over $25,000, "Borrower hereby grants to SBA, the secured interest […] in and to any and all "Collateral."" The agreement goes on to define collateral as ALL tangible and intangible personal property that Borrow now owns or shall acquire … It further goes on to say that the "Borrower will not sell or transfer any collateral" and borrower will not accept future advances under any superior liens on the collateral securing this loan. We all hope that we will be in position to pay back the loan when the payments become due and that the issue of collateral won't even be a factor. But between now and when the loan is paid in full, you basically cannot sell anything you currently own without first requesting permission from the SBA. So three years down the line, if you need to sell some old equipment or furniture to get a little extra cash to keep you afloat, you have to remember to submit a request to the SBA, and hope that they approve your request.
- For the life of the loan, borrowers are required to carry hazard insurance to cover at least 80% of the insurable value of collateral (remember collateral is pretty much everything you own at the time of the loan). It is unclear if you can use the loan proceeds to pay for said insurance. Whether or not you can, we are all trying to save money, not incur additional expenses.
- Another expense that a borrower may have to bear is the cost of hiring an independent accountant to perform a review of their financial statements. There is an entire section labeled "Books and Records" which stipulates that borrowers must maintain "current and proper books of account" and "Upon written request of the SBA, borrower will accompany such statements with an 'Accountant's Review Report.' This can be pretty costly and assuming you still have loan funds available after payroll, rent, etc., it is unclear if you can use any part of the loan proceeds to cover this cost.
- On May 13, a man in Atlanta, Georgia was arrested for misusing proceeds from a Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan he took to keep his company afloat. He spent $1.5 million on jewelry and leased a 2019 Rolls Royce. You don't have to be a genius to know that the paycheck protection loan should be used on paychecks, not flashy jewelry and cars. This was a clear-cut case of fraud and he should be subject to the severe civil and criminal penalties that come with these relief programs. But what happens to little ole us if we simply forget to notify the SBA that we sold an old printer they claimed as collateral or if we forget to obtain the required hazard insurance? Depending on the severity of the faux-pas, the EIDL comes with the following penalties: - The loan goes into default and becomes immediately due in full; - The borrower becomes civilly liable to the SBA in an amount equal to 1.5 times the original principal amount; or - Imprisonment I highly doubt you will go to prison for selling an old printer, but one could lose sleep wondering if an inadvertent omission can cause you to have to pay the loan back in full ahead of your planned timeline. Despite several attempts to contact the SBA customer service line, I have not been able to reach anyone to get clarification on the terms of the loan. Applicants are given up to 30 days to e-sign the loan agreement and I encourage everyone to take their time to read and understand the loan agreement before signing it. Your need for the loan may outweigh the questionable terms of the agreement, but it is better to know what you are signing up for rather than to be caught off guard later. And, if you want to hire an attorney or accountant to help you understand the loan agreement, you may have to get permission from the SBA—oh, did I not mention that? If you're thinking about taking advantage of EIDL for your business, approach the EIDL application as you would any other contract. Be sure to read the fine print, ask questions and seek clarification before you sign.
Lydia Desnoyers operates Desnoyers CPA LLC in Miami.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250