Broward Lawsuit Argues Loans Involving Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Qualify for CARES Act Relief
An emergency law providing homeowners relief from foreclosures could be more widely applicable than it seemed on first glance, according to a Weston foreclosure attorney.
June 01, 2020 at 02:36 PM
3 minute read
When Weston foreclosure attorney Jonathan Kline of JK Law read through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act — an impromptu law passed in March to ease economic hardship amid the COVID-19 pandemic — he had a revelation. And it could signal great news for homeowners litigating against foreclosure.
Section 4022 of the CARES Act temporarily blocks federally-backed mortgage loan servicers from enforcing foreclosures against homeowners who are experiencing hardship, regardless of whether they're delinquent. But, while federally backed usually means a Federal Housing Administration, Veterans Affairs or U.S. Department of Agriculture loan, Kline noticed the provision goes further.
Subsection (G) of the provision says that federally backed mortgage loans include those "purchased or securitized by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation or the Federal National Mortgage Association."
Those two government-sponsored enterprises are commonly known as Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, which, instead of acting as regular lenders, back or guarantee loans in the secondary mortgage market. Fannie Mae tends to buy mortgage loans from commercial banks, while Freddie Mac typically buys them from smaller banks.
Kline said this means homeowners could be entitled to up to one year of forbearance under the CARES Act if Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac have purchased or securitized their loans.
He's sought notice to file the first two of what he says will be a string of motions in Broward Circuit Court, asking for 180-day stays in clients' cases. Homeowners can later apply to extend those stays for another 180 days.
The biggest obstacle, according to Kline, is that lenders and servicers will argue that the loans are not federally backed and therefore don't qualify, meaning he'll have to fight to prove otherwise.
"They may not realize that the act extends to securitized loans by Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae, and that's what puts this in a different category," Kline said.
But if Kline succeeds, he says the difference could be huge, potentially triggering an influx of similar motions to stay under the CARES Act as more than half of all loans could be eligible.
"You just took the numbers from a small amount of loans under FHA, VA and the Department of Agriculture to what I believe is now over 50% of all loans," Kline said. "They don't even have to own it [the loan]. All you have to do is have it securitized by Fannie Mae and/or Freddie Mac and you qualify under this particular CARES Act provision."
Homeowners have until July 11 to file motions to stay under the CARES Act, according to Kline, who said anyone whose loan is in a trust can check on it at sec.gov/edgar.
"If they can find their trust, they can look over the terms and conditions or the provisions of the trust, which incorporate Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae standards into this securitization process," Kline said.
Among Kline's clients seeking abatement are defendants Igdalis Roldan and Ivory Joe Christen, sued by Wells Fargo Bank National Association in 2019, and Meir Jacob Zamstein and Eilana Cohen, facing a 2008 lawsuit from U.S. Bank National Association.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
3 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readDisbarred Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Lawsuit Against Miami-Dade Judges
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250