Litigation to Continue in Miami as Spartan Race Stumbles in Class Action Over Insurance Fee
Since the judge denied the change-of-venue request and Spartan Race's most recent motion to stay all discovery, an attorney for the plaintiff said, "Now we will depose all of the executives."
June 01, 2020 at 03:35 PM
4 minute read
The organizers of the Spartan Race just ran into another legal obstacle.
U.S. District Court Judge Beth Bloom in Miami denied a motion by Spartan Race Inc. to both have a class action dismissed and venue transferred to a court in Massachusetts. Bloom also allowed depositions to proceed.
The case is a financial and public relations problem for Spartan Race as it competes with other competitors in the growing field of obstacle races. The complaint included an allegation that Spartan Race has taken millions of dollars from consumers in violation of Florida and common law for its "racer insurance fee," and that Spartan Race "pockets nearly all."
Florida native Aaron Fruitstone is the lead plaintiff in the case. He is among hundreds of thousands of athletes in the state and across the country that have competed in a Spartan Race. To participate, athletes had to pay a $14 insurance fee, "which Spartan Race secretly pocketed," alleged plaintiffs counsel Adam Moskowitz, who's handling the Florida litigation.
"We sued them for fraud, and we expanded it recently to nationwide because we are using the Massachusetts consumer statue where they're based," Moskowitz said.
Since Bloom denied the change-of-venue request and Spartan Race's most recent motion to stay all discovery, Moskowitz is looking toward the next move.
"Now we will depose all of the executives," he said.
Scott Bassman, a partner at Cole, Scott & Kissane in Fort Lauderdale who represents Spartan Race in this case, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Spartan Race has athletic events that take place across the globe in different terrains and various distances at each chosen venue. These competitions often involve running long distances while navigating challenging obstacles. For instance, an upcoming race in Mulberry, Florida, advertises a "21K Beast and 5K spring weekend" which is a half marathon that has 30 obstacles "engineered to push you out of your comfort zone and right up to your limits." Prices for that event start at $129.99.
The lawsuit claimed that the required insurance coverage is "secondary" and the company forced its "insurance scheme" upon the racers. Since the insurance is secondary, the athlete would be required to first utilize its own health insurance coverage with all the difficulty that ensues when seeking coverage for a medical expense. Following exhaustion of the athlete's primary coverage, Spartan Race's medical coverage could be utilized after satisfying a $500 deductible.
"That's a big deal because a lot of these companies charge you these insurance charges, which is just a pass-through," Moskowitz said. "They don't offer the insurance, they just keep a secret kickback, which they really are not allowed to because they are not an insurance company."
Read the order:
In its reply to plaintiff's response to the motion to transfer venue, Spartan Race said the athletes participating in its races agreed to a binding contract. In that contract, the registration payment total included a "mandatory administrative and racer insurance fee."
Spartan Race's website includes a FAQ section, in which it claimed to have purchased "accident medical insurance coverage from a licensed third-party insurance carrier," which was secondary coverage to the racers' primary medical coverage and was subject to the $500 deductible. The webpage does not say how much Spartan Race paid for the third-party medical insurance coverage.
Spartan Race claimed it did not make any "misrepresentation or misstatement as to how the $14 fee is calculated or allocated." Because of this assertion, Spartan Race insisted that a participating athlete could not reasonably expect that the racer insurance fee would only be distributed to the "third-party insurance carrier," rather than being retained by Spartan Race itself.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Lawyer Turned Emmy-Winning Comedian is Headlining at the Broward Center for the Performing Arts
4 minute readHow Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250