Companies and Executives Must Be Extra Vigilant of Disclosures During Pandemic
In the midst the current COVID-19 pandemic, the SEC is paying attention. The Division of Enforcement has made clear that it will act, and act quickly, to stop fraudulent conduct that falls under its jurisdiction related to the pandemic.
June 02, 2020 at 09:49 AM
3 minute read
In the midst the current COVID-19 pandemic, the SEC is paying attention. The Division of Enforcement has made clear that it will act, and act quickly, to stop fraudulent conduct that falls under its jurisdiction related to the pandemic.
Stephanie Avakian, co-director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement, has warned, "the Enforcement Division is committed to swiftly shutting down COVID-19 investment scams, seeking trading suspensions where appropriate, and pursuing fraud charges against both entities and individuals when warranted."
The SEC has taken actions to back up Avakian's words. Most recently, the SEC's Miami Regional Office brought an enforcement action against a West Palm Beach company and its CEO for allegedly issuing false or misleading press releases claiming the company was able to acquire and supply large quantities of N95 or similar masks to protect wearers from the COVID-19 virus. And, as has been widely reported, the SEC has issued a litany of trading suspensions, including Zoom Technologies (not the video conferencing platform we are all using, hence the suspension due to confusion).
While there are, without a doubt, legitimate business opportunities that are available in this current environment, companies that are poised to seize on those opportunities should do so with caution, particularly if they are subject to reporting requirements and/or are traded on any index, from the OTC on up.
So, what guidance should companies and their executives should be following?
The SEC chairman along with the SEC's director of Division of Corporate Finance have issued a public statement titled "The Importance of Disclosure—For Investors, Markets and Our Fight Against COVID-19," that should be a must read for every executive. Stressing the need that companies must provide full and accurate disclosure in this ever-changing economic landscape, companies must consider where the company stands today, operationally and financially compared to its pre-pandemic operations, how the company's COVID-19 response, including its efforts to protect the health and well-being of its workforce and its customers, is progressing, and how its operations and financial condition may change as all our efforts to fight COVID-19 progress. Historical information may be relatively less significant.
That said, given the SEC's clear emphasis on enforcement, there is the ever-present danger of misinterpretation and over-reach. Companies, in non-COVID-19 times, were entitled to certain leeway with respect to projections and "puffery." While the law remains unchanged from a mere two months ago (which seems like a lifetime ago in these times), there is the potential for a different initial interpretation by the SEC and the courts in the grey areas given the current climate. As always, striking the proper balance is the key. In times like these, however, given that everything is out of balance, where that sweet-spot falls is going to be a matter of interpretation and advocacy.
While we are all following COVID-19 "curve," hoping it continues its apparent downward trend, do not be surprised if the SEC enforcement numbers show the opposite. Companies and their executives should be vigilant to avoid becoming a statistic.
Russell Koonin and Adam Schwartz are partners at Homer Bonner Jacobs Ortiz, located in Miami Florida. Koonin and Schwartz both previously served as SEC Senior Trial Counsel, and were Assistant U.S. Attorneys in the Southern District of Florida. They can be reached at [email protected] and [email protected], respectively.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDon’t Forget the Owner’s Manual: A Guide to Proving Liability Through Manufacturers’ Warnings and Instructions
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250