Companies and Executives Must Be Extra Vigilant of Disclosures During Pandemic
In the midst the current COVID-19 pandemic, the SEC is paying attention. The Division of Enforcement has made clear that it will act, and act quickly, to stop fraudulent conduct that falls under its jurisdiction related to the pandemic.
June 02, 2020 at 09:49 AM
3 minute read
In the midst the current COVID-19 pandemic, the SEC is paying attention. The Division of Enforcement has made clear that it will act, and act quickly, to stop fraudulent conduct that falls under its jurisdiction related to the pandemic.
Stephanie Avakian, co-director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement, has warned, "the Enforcement Division is committed to swiftly shutting down COVID-19 investment scams, seeking trading suspensions where appropriate, and pursuing fraud charges against both entities and individuals when warranted."
The SEC has taken actions to back up Avakian's words. Most recently, the SEC's Miami Regional Office brought an enforcement action against a West Palm Beach company and its CEO for allegedly issuing false or misleading press releases claiming the company was able to acquire and supply large quantities of N95 or similar masks to protect wearers from the COVID-19 virus. And, as has been widely reported, the SEC has issued a litany of trading suspensions, including Zoom Technologies (not the video conferencing platform we are all using, hence the suspension due to confusion).
While there are, without a doubt, legitimate business opportunities that are available in this current environment, companies that are poised to seize on those opportunities should do so with caution, particularly if they are subject to reporting requirements and/or are traded on any index, from the OTC on up.
So, what guidance should companies and their executives should be following?
The SEC chairman along with the SEC's director of Division of Corporate Finance have issued a public statement titled "The Importance of Disclosure—For Investors, Markets and Our Fight Against COVID-19," that should be a must read for every executive. Stressing the need that companies must provide full and accurate disclosure in this ever-changing economic landscape, companies must consider where the company stands today, operationally and financially compared to its pre-pandemic operations, how the company's COVID-19 response, including its efforts to protect the health and well-being of its workforce and its customers, is progressing, and how its operations and financial condition may change as all our efforts to fight COVID-19 progress. Historical information may be relatively less significant.
That said, given the SEC's clear emphasis on enforcement, there is the ever-present danger of misinterpretation and over-reach. Companies, in non-COVID-19 times, were entitled to certain leeway with respect to projections and "puffery." While the law remains unchanged from a mere two months ago (which seems like a lifetime ago in these times), there is the potential for a different initial interpretation by the SEC and the courts in the grey areas given the current climate. As always, striking the proper balance is the key. In times like these, however, given that everything is out of balance, where that sweet-spot falls is going to be a matter of interpretation and advocacy.
While we are all following COVID-19 "curve," hoping it continues its apparent downward trend, do not be surprised if the SEC enforcement numbers show the opposite. Companies and their executives should be vigilant to avoid becoming a statistic.
Russell Koonin and Adam Schwartz are partners at Homer Bonner Jacobs Ortiz, located in Miami Florida. Koonin and Schwartz both previously served as SEC Senior Trial Counsel, and were Assistant U.S. Attorneys in the Southern District of Florida. They can be reached at [email protected] and [email protected], respectively.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'If You Have the Offering, India Is the Shining Star': International Firms on Bolstering Their India Desks
- 2Meet Christopher Benjamin: New Miami-Dade Judge
- 3Are Federal and State Superfund Laws the Best Way to Address Microplastics?
- 4Attorney Can't Invest in Firm With Non-Lawyer Owner?
- 5Former Perkins Coie Partner Moves to Stradley Ronon in Chicago
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250