Bar Seeks to Suspend South Florida Lawyer Over 'Campaign of Unprofessional, Unethical and Fraudulent Conduct'
The personal injury attorney is accused of violating 17 Florida Bar rules.
June 08, 2020 at 03:03 PM
4 minute read
The Florida Bar has filed an emergency petition asking the state Supreme Court to suspend Scot Strems of the Strems Law Firm in Coral Gables, alleging he "sits at the head of a vast campaign of unprofessional, unethical and fraudulent conduct that now infects courts and communities across the state."
The Strems Law Firm specializes in property insurance, personal injury and workers' compensation cases and has at least 14 attorneys across five Florida offices, according to its website.
But the Florida Bar's petition filed Thursday called that website "a professional veneer," accusing Strems of violating 17 ethical rules. The petition pointed to an "alarming number" of cases that follow a pattern usually resulting in sanctions orders.
The bar collated orders and filings from 18 different cases that it said reveal a pattern, but "by no means represent the totality of sanctions issued against respondent."
The pattern, according to the bar, begins with multiple lawsuits filed for separate losses under the same policy. Then comes "a ceaseless pattern of delay," as deadlines, depositions and court orders are allegedly ignored and dishonest or false statements allegedly follow.
"For example, dubious reasons might be given to excuse an absence from a hearing, or SLF may conveniently forget to apprise the court of a client's death," the petition said.
|Violations in 'virtually every case'
The bar claims that months or years later, the firm and/or its clients are usually sanctioned and "the end result is a massive waste of judicial resources and defense costs, and—of course—nothing for Mr. Strems' clients."
One of those sanctions orders came before the Fourth District Court of Appeal on Wednesday, when it affirmed the dismissal of an insurance case as punishment but overturned $22,877 in sanctions.
|
Related story: South Florida Law Firm Dodges Nearly $23,000 Sanction Over Misconduct in Insurance Suit
Strems is yet to formally respond to the allegations. But his attorneys Scott Tozian of Smith Tozian Daniel & Davis in Tampa and Miami solo practitioner Mark Kamilar said he denies the accusations.
"Scot Strems strongly disputes the allegations and is working with the bar to set a hearing to present his defense," Kamilar said.
The petition claimed Strems's conduct not only damages his clients but also hurts insurers, insurance lawyers, the courts, the public and Florida homeowners, who pay the price with insurance premiums.
The cases featured in the bar's petition stem from Broward, Miami-Dade, Hillsborough, Orange, Collier, Volusia, Polk and Lee Counties, and resulted in admonishments from 17 different judges and at least $89,410 in sanctions.
The bar also attached affidavits from Hillsborough Circuit Judges Gregory Holder and Rex Barbas, who've presided over some of the firm's cases. The judges stated it's widely known among their colleagues that Strems violates the Rules of Professional Responsibility in "virtually every case where he and his firm enter an appearance," according to the petition.
Strems was admitted to practice in 2007 and has not been disciplined within the last 10 years, according to his bar profile. He holds a law degree from the University of Miami.
|Read the full petition:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readBack-To-Back Hurricanes' Impact on Florida Legal Work Will Go Beyond Usual Suspects
5 minute readHolland & Knight Snags 2 Insurance Partners in New York and Philadelphia From Goodwin
3 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250