Miami-Dade Halts Eviction Summonses in Coronavirus Pandemic
At least one tenant who happens to be a landlord says he received a summons despite state and county suspensions.
June 08, 2020 at 03:22 PM
4 minute read
Miami-Dade County renters received another layer of protection from eviction during the coronavirus pandemic, but how effective it's been is up for debate.
In response to an inquiry May 16 from Miami-Dade Clerk of Courts Harvey Ruvin, Chief Circuit Judge Bertila Soto directed his office to stop issuing summonses for evictions and foreclosures due to nonpayment until a state moratorium expires.
Gov. Ron DeSantis suspended foreclosures and evictions April 2 for 45 days and extended his order twice, most recently until July 1.
Ruvin's letter noted his office and position are neutral and the action merely ministerial in nature, so he would follow Soto's direction on issues like summonses.
He included two letters from the Florida Court Clerks & Comptrollers, a support group for the state's elected clerks and comptrollers, instructing clerks to keep accepting eviction filings and collect fees but take no other action without direction from the court, including issuing summonses.
Ruvin said his office has issued no writs of possession — the final legal step to push a tenant out of an apartment — since before DeSantis' original suspension.
The Florida Supreme Court on March 24 issued an administrative order telling court clerks to suspend writs of possessions.
But whether summonses have halted under Soto's May 18 directive isn't entirely clear.
The Miami-Dade clerk's office issued a summons May 29 against Hector Alvarez and his father, Hector Alvarez Sr., who were sued May 26 by the landlord of a Miami Beach condominium unit where Alvarez Sr. lives for failure to pay March and April rent.
The younger Alvarez rents units for himself and his 91-year-old father in the same four-story South Beach building at 158 Ocean Drive.
Landlord Joshua Goldberg and his attorney Michael Perse, shareholder at Kluger, Kaplan, Silverman, Katzen & Levine in Miami, maintain the Alvarezes have declined to pay rent and vacate the unit without a legal basis.
The suit lists unlawful detainer, breach of contract, unpaid rent and ejectment counts.
Perse maintains he didn't file an eviction case during the moratorium but filed a damages claim. The Alvarezes stopped paying rent March 1, which was before COVID-19 emergency orders were issued.
The father-son defendants are blocking Goldberg's plan to sell the unit, Perse said.
"We do not want to sue for eviction. We want to sue for damages and to eject them, and it will happen within the eviction deadline after the emergency order expires in any event," Perse said. "The governor's order was meant to protect tenants from immediate eviction in like a three-day notice. They are just people who don't want to pay their rent. They are not people without means. They are using this as a way to gain a favorable advantage for themselves."
Miami attorney and civic activist David Winker, who represents the Alvarezes, has a different take, saying the landlord filed an eviction case during the moratorium and the complaint has been mischaracterized as a breach of contract case.
Perse and Goldberg checked the 'contract & indebtedness" box when filing the case rather than "properly and truthfully signifying that this is, in fact, a residential eviction due to unpaid rent," Winker argued in an emergency motion to dismiss filed Saturday.
The younger Alvarez is a landlord with 15 rental units.
"He was reflecting how ironic it is that he is being sued for eviction during a moratorium on eviction when he has five tenants that he could be evicting but is not because he is abiding by the moratorium," Winker said.
Beyond the issue of summonses, eviction filings haven't stopped. there is the fact that landlords still can file for evictions. As estimated 700 Miami-Dade eviction cases have been filed despite the suspension.
"These evictions are prohibited by the governor's moratorium and shouldn't be filed in the first place," Winker said. "I'm glad the courts are going to stop them from moving forward by not issuing summonses."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All830 Brickell is Open After Two-Year Delay That Led to Winston & Strawn Pulling Lease
3 minute readMiami Lawyers Beat Other Local Sectors, Attorneys Elsewhere in Office Usage
3 minute read'Would've Been Snoring Without Ya': Fort Lauderdale Jury Awards $4.5 Million in Condo Investment Spat
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250