Florida State Courts Delay Reopening Until Late July
Most Florida state court proceedings are delayed until late July, which means most operations will he curtailed for more than four months.
June 09, 2020 at 03:51 PM
4 minute read
While other jurisdictions are resuming trials, Florida's chief justice pushed back a hard deadline on cases with juries until late July and slid reports assessing a pilot program for remote civil jury trials until October.
Florida courts will remain closed to all but essential functions through July 20, two weeks longer than previously ordered by Florida Supreme Court Chief Justice Charles Canady. Statewide grand jury proceedings won't resume until July 27.
The first statewide court restrictions took effect March 13, which means the mass shutdown with limited exceptions will last more than four months. The Florida Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal have adopted virtual arguments, and constitutionally mandated hearings are being held.
Miami-Dade Circuit Court is part of a five-circuit group testing virtual civil jury trials, and Broward Circuit Chief Judge Jack Tuter has been pushing ahead on his own with remote experiments.
The next test invites prospective jurors to a Zoom meeting room July 10 for voir dire in a fictional case with questioning to be coordinated by members of the American Board of Trial Advocates.
Tuter is uncertain if the main downtown Fort Lauderdale courthouse will be open by late July and said the circuit is unlikely to send subpoenas for prospective jurors to come to court by August or possibly September.
"The deciding factor will be what the health situation looks like," Tuter said Tuesday. "We're going to proceed with extreme caution."
Jury proceedings including grand jury work, jury selection and criminal and civil jury trials are governed by the July 20 deadline.
Under an administrative order issued Monday, Canady delayed a July 31 deadline for reports on testing for remote civil jury trials until Oct. 2.
Remote jury trials are authorized, but chief circuit judges would have to approve any move to in-person proceedings in counties with Phase 2 reopening standards.
That covers all but South Florida, which has over half of all Florida cases as counts climb in other counties that had been seeing only slow growth.
Canady notes the Phase 2 benchmark is tied to a two-week improvement on COVID-19 data at the county level.
But Florida is seeing an unusual spurt, adding 1,000 daily cases for a week. State data shows new weekly cases and the percentage of positive tests have been climbing since May 18.
"I applaud the efforts to keep the work of courts moving consistent with public safety," Canady said in a memo to judges. But he noted some circuits in a working group he assigned to examine court reopenings "have raised questions about how to interpret the Phase 2 benchmark related to improving COVID-19 health conditions."
Canady scheduled a meeting of chief judges Thursday and said, "COVID-19, and the transition to Phase 2, will be a central part of our discussion."
South Florida federal trials have been delayed until at least Aug. 31.
In Texas, a test jury trial was held last week in Dallas, and a federal criminal trial is set for Monday in the Northern District of Texas. Experiments are under way in state courts, but live jury trials aren't expected to resume until August.
Read the order:
Read more:
Miami-Dade Circuit Among 5 Florida Courts Chosen to Test Virtual Civil Jury Trials
'Quiet. Mom's in Court': Akerman Miami Partner Describes Taking Part in Historic High Court Virtual Hearing
'Most Troublesome' Issue: Experiment Tests Remote Jury Trial With COVID-19 Around
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Families Settle Court Battle Over Who Owns Parkland Killer's Name, Likeness
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 2The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
- 3Law Firm Accused of Barratry for Allegedly Soliciting Crash Victims
- 4Carlton Fields Downsizes in Move to New Atlanta Office
- 5Trump's Selection of Zeldin to Head EPA Draws Surprise, Little Hope of Avoiding Deregulation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250