Lawyers' Twitter Outreach to Protesters Sparks Encouragement, Backlash
From a sudden burst in social media engagement to derogatory messages, lawyers say leveraging social media to announce their willingness to represent peaceful protesters presents opportunities and challenges.
June 09, 2020 at 10:00 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
The death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police officers triggered worldwide protests over police brutality and racial injustice. After widespread arrests, some solo practitioners and boutiques began posting their willingness to provide free legal representation to peaceful protesters.
Social media posts present an opportunity and a risk, however. By leveraging an international audience, lawyers say they reach more people, but they've also received threats.
Derrick Morgan Jr., a sports attorney at eight-lawyer Saeed & Little, said the idea for his May 30 tweet announcing the firm would provide pro bono services for protesters arrested in Chicago, Indianapolis and Louisville, Kentucky, was sparked by his own protest the same day in Chicago.
Morgan noted protesting felt natural to him because his family has always been politically engaged, but he thought he could do more for those in need with his legal background.
"Many of my ancestors in my family weren't afforded the same opportunities as me," Morgan said. "I don't think I'm special by any means. I'm in a place to make a difference. If I'm able, why not step up when I have the opportunities and resources to do so?"
After running the idea by his boss, Morgan said he posted the announcement on Twitter and was immediately inundated with retweets and notifications.
"It's been a mixed bag," he said of the responses to the firm's tweet. "A lot of people are very much so supportive of it, a lot of people wanted to help, and we've received a lot of backlash, countless death threats, which are interesting."
"I didn't expect people calling our phones and threatening our lives and pulling our address and saying they were sending people to our houses and calling us derogatory names," Morgan added.
Other lawyers say their social media posts attracted largely well-wishers, supporters and some impacted protesters. But they too received backlash, which sometimes stemmed from a misconception over who qualifies for their pro bono services.
Kidd Corvey & Simpson partner Chad Simpson said his firm made it "pretty clear we were talking about peaceful protests" when it announced on Twitter it would provide pro bono services. However, "some people misunderstood what we were saying."
Some took it as an endorsement for looting, but Simpson said the post reached a wider audience unattainable through traditional means.
"To us, the quickest way to reach people is a social media account. There's traditional ways like newspapers and traditional media, but it doesn't reach the eyeballs like social media," he explained.
Social media also represents a cheaper and perhaps more ethical means of announcing pro bono services for a misdemeanor or ordinance violation.
"Any 'better way' [of contacting arrested protesters] will likely run afoul of the Florida Rules of Professional Conduct," Winter Haven solo practitioner Andrew Darling wrote in an email. Last month, Darling announced on Twitter his willingness to provide free legal services to protesters arrested in the Orlando area.
"Since the protesters that I am willing to represent pro bono are those charged with misdemeanors, city or county ordinance violations, it does not make sense for me to spend substantial resources to attract pro bono clients," he said.
In Miami, Eduardo Maura of Ayala Law in Miami offered pro bono representation and said on Twitter that five attorneys "are willing to offer their time to help victims of policy brutality."
While lawyers aren't utilizing paid advertisements, they are spending valuable time and resources on their new pro bono clients.
The tangible risk is that a pro bono matter could cost the firm $5,000 to $10,000, starting from verifying the protester's case number through representation, Morgan noted.
Despite the added unpaid workload and social media attacks, lawyers said announcing their pro bono services on social media was worthwhile.
"That's a part of doing our job and protecting the Constitution and making sure everyone has effective representation," said Kimbrough Legal founder Tycha Kimbrough, who along with other Texas-based attorneys is representing protesters.
Kimbrough said she does not put much stock in criticism about supporting looters and other accusations lodged at her. "I'm unfazed and unbothered by those remarks. I believe I need to continue what I'm doing to serve my community."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250