Six Important Questions on PPP Loan Forgiveness
On May 15, the U.S. Department of the Treasury released the long-awaited loan forgiveness application. Below are some answers to what we anticipate will be the most frequently asked questions.
June 09, 2020 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
On May 15, the U.S. Department of the Treasury released the long-awaited loan forgiveness application. Below are some answers to what we anticipate will be the most frequently asked questions.
What amount of the loan is forgivable?
Borrowers are eligible for forgiveness for the payroll costs paid and payroll costs incurred during the eight-week (56-day) covered period and alternative covered period. Additionally, certain nonpayroll costs are eligible for forgiveness. These include covered mortgage obligations, including payments of interest (not including any prepayment or payment of principal) on any lien against real or personal property, covered rent obligations, including business rent or lease payments pursuant to lease agreements for real or personal property, and covered utility payments, including business payments for electricity, gas, water, transportation, telephone, or internet access. Please keep in mind that these costs must have been incurred or in force before Feb. 15.
A borrower's eligibility for loan forgiveness will be evaluated in accordance with PPP regulations and guidance issued by the SBA through the date of the application. The SBA may direct a lender to disapprove the borrower's loan forgiveness application if the SBA determines that the borrower was ineligible for the PPP loan. It is crucial that borrowers make every effort to determine whether they meet eligibility requirements before submitting the application.
What is the difference between the covered period and the alternative covered period?
The covered period refers to the eight-week (56-day) period beginning the day of your PPP loan disbursement. The alternative covered period is an option for borrowers with a biweekly (or more frequent) payroll schedule. These borrowers may elect to calculate eligible payroll costs using the eight-week (56-day) period that begins on the first day of their first pay period following their PPP loan disbursement.
How do I request forgiveness?
Loan forgiveness is not automatic. The application for forgiveness will include documents that verify the number of full-time employees and pay rates, as well as payments on eligible mortgage, lease and utility obligations. The lender must make a decision regarding forgiveness within 60 days. The loan forgiveness application can be found on the U.S. Department of the Treasury's website.
All borrowers must certify whether the total loan amount of their business or affiliated businesses, is $2 million or above. The SBA has previously notified small businesses that loans of $2 million or above will likely be audited.
What if all or a portion of the loan is not forgivable?
If all or a portion of the loan is not forgivable, the loan will need to be repaid. The loan will become due in 2 years from the date it was funded. Although interest will accrue, payments can be deferred for 6 months and there is no prepayment penalty.
What happens if I had to reduce my full-time workforce during the covered period or alternative covered period?
If you had to reduce the number of full-time equivalent employees during the covered period or alternative covered period, your forgivable amount may be reduced. However, if a borrower reduced its full-time equivalent employee levels in the period beginning Feb. 15, and ending April 26, but then restores its full-time equivalent employee levels by no later than June 30 to its full-time equivalent employee levels in the borrower's pay period that included Feb. 15, a borrower can avoid a reduction in the amount forgiven.
Loan forgiveness reductions will not be reduced for employee reductions related to individuals to whom the borrower has made a written offer in good faith to rehire but the employee declined, employees whose employment was terminated for cause, or employees who voluntarily resigned.
What if I pay myself via an owner's draw?
The SBA has clarified that any owner-employee or self-employed individual may calculate payroll costs as eight weeks of 2019 compensation. However, the total forgivable amount is capped at $15,385 per individual.
Eric A. Rosen is a shareholder and chair of the bankruptcy, creditors' rights and business restructuring practice group at Fowler White Burnett in West Palm Beach. Contact him at [email protected]. Alexander J. Monje is an associate in the firm's c commercial litigation practice group in Miami. Contact him at AMonje@fowler-white.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Pusillanimous Press
- 2Contract Lifecycle Management Company ContractPodAi Unveils Leah Drive
- 3'Great News' for Businesses? Judge Halts Transparency Mandate
- 4Consilio Announces ‘Native AI Review,’ Expanding Its Gen AI E-Discovery Offerings
- 5Federal Judge Hits US With $227,000 Sanction for Discovery Misconduct
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250