'The First Jerks to Go Into Court': Attorneys Say Brickell Will Become Hot Spot for Commercial Evictions as Courts Reopen
"In the Miami and the Brickell area, we've got bigger tenants that have not been paying rent," said Harsh Arora, a partner at Kelley Kronenberg. "That area in South Florida will be affected more than any area in Palm Beach County or Broward County."
June 11, 2020 at 02:47 PM
4 minute read
Attorneys say the last two months have been a delicate balance between commercial tenants and their landlords regarding payment of the rent due under their leases.
But now, some tensions are heating up in some parts of South Florida where landlords are increasingly putting pressure on their business tenants to pay up or renegotiate their leases.
Jeffrey Gilbert, a partner with Cozen O'Connor in Miami, said perception and court closures played a major role in the recent change in business relationships between commercial tenants and landlords amid the coronavirus pandemic.
"Landlords did not necessarily want to be the first jerks to go into court when everything was uncertain, and people were reeling from the coronavirus," Gilbert said. "Courts were closed and there were plenty of orders in place about only emergencies being heard."
But things are changing.
Harsh Arora, a partner at Kelley Kronenberg in Fort Lauderdale, said that since Florida has permitted most businesses to reopen in phase one of the four-phase reopening plan, more businesses are opening their doors to customers, leading landlords to demand their fair share of the revenue.
"Landlords want to make sure they get paid, or create some pressure on tenants to proceed forward and file suit on breach of lease, potential eviction," Arora said. "If that is not agreed upon or some pressure is not created where they enter into an arrangement, landlords want to proceed forward and resort to court intervention."
Arora has seen another trend where the tenants are "jumping the gun" and suing for breach of lease terms, bringing up the issue that they have not been able to use their storefronts because of the current economic conditions. Since many tenants have been unable to recover money from their insurance companies or invalidate their leases, tenants have resorted to claiming that their lease terms are unenforceable, the attorney said.
For instance, a common claim tenants have made is that the pandemic is outside of their control and prevents them from meeting their contractual obligations. This argument might permit a tenant to avoid paying rent that accrued while the business was required to close by state or county administrative orders, Arora said. The expectation is that by making this force majeure argument, the tenant will be able to renegotiate the terms of its lease. Property owners have responded that the government ordered closures are not a force majeure, and the tenant still owes rent under the lease, he said.
Brickell will be litigation hot spot
Arora pointed to mixed-use communities, like the Brickell area, where he said landlords are having problems collecting rent from their commercial tenants. He said they are unable to obtain writs of possession, due to an interpretation of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis' Executive Order 20-94, as extended by Executive Orders 20-121 and 20-137, despite that order only applying to residential leases. The Florida Supreme Court has suspended the issuance of writs of possession by Supreme Court Administrative Order No. AOSC20-23.
Without a writ of possession, the landlords cannot evict tenants from rental property and replace the defaulting tenants with new tenants.
The attorneys say with courts previously closed to the public, the challenge to enforce lease terms becomes nearly insurmountable. When the clerks of the courts are permitted to issue writs of possession, Arora predicts the courts will be flooded with commercial property eviction actions.
"In the Miami and the Brickell area, we've got bigger tenants that have not been paying rent. The rent is high," Arora said. "That area in South Florida will be affected more than any area in Palm Beach County or Broward County."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKirkland & Ellis Taps Former Co-Chair of Greenberg Traurig’s Digital Infrastructure Practice
3 minute readGreenberg Traurig Combines Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate Groups, Anticipating Uptick in Demand
4 minute readThese Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
6 minute readO'Melveny Secures Global Clearances for Korean Air-Asiana Merger
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250