'The First Jerks to Go Into Court': Attorneys Say Brickell Will Become Hot Spot for Commercial Evictions as Courts Reopen
"In the Miami and the Brickell area, we've got bigger tenants that have not been paying rent," said Harsh Arora, a partner at Kelley Kronenberg. "That area in South Florida will be affected more than any area in Palm Beach County or Broward County."
June 11, 2020 at 02:47 PM
4 minute read
Attorneys say the last two months have been a delicate balance between commercial tenants and their landlords regarding payment of the rent due under their leases.
But now, some tensions are heating up in some parts of South Florida where landlords are increasingly putting pressure on their business tenants to pay up or renegotiate their leases.
Jeffrey Gilbert, a partner with Cozen O'Connor in Miami, said perception and court closures played a major role in the recent change in business relationships between commercial tenants and landlords amid the coronavirus pandemic.
"Landlords did not necessarily want to be the first jerks to go into court when everything was uncertain, and people were reeling from the coronavirus," Gilbert said. "Courts were closed and there were plenty of orders in place about only emergencies being heard."
But things are changing.
Harsh Arora, a partner at Kelley Kronenberg in Fort Lauderdale, said that since Florida has permitted most businesses to reopen in phase one of the four-phase reopening plan, more businesses are opening their doors to customers, leading landlords to demand their fair share of the revenue.
"Landlords want to make sure they get paid, or create some pressure on tenants to proceed forward and file suit on breach of lease, potential eviction," Arora said. "If that is not agreed upon or some pressure is not created where they enter into an arrangement, landlords want to proceed forward and resort to court intervention."
Arora has seen another trend where the tenants are "jumping the gun" and suing for breach of lease terms, bringing up the issue that they have not been able to use their storefronts because of the current economic conditions. Since many tenants have been unable to recover money from their insurance companies or invalidate their leases, tenants have resorted to claiming that their lease terms are unenforceable, the attorney said.
For instance, a common claim tenants have made is that the pandemic is outside of their control and prevents them from meeting their contractual obligations. This argument might permit a tenant to avoid paying rent that accrued while the business was required to close by state or county administrative orders, Arora said. The expectation is that by making this force majeure argument, the tenant will be able to renegotiate the terms of its lease. Property owners have responded that the government ordered closures are not a force majeure, and the tenant still owes rent under the lease, he said.
|Brickell will be litigation hot spot
Arora pointed to mixed-use communities, like the Brickell area, where he said landlords are having problems collecting rent from their commercial tenants. He said they are unable to obtain writs of possession, due to an interpretation of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis' Executive Order 20-94, as extended by Executive Orders 20-121 and 20-137, despite that order only applying to residential leases. The Florida Supreme Court has suspended the issuance of writs of possession by Supreme Court Administrative Order No. AOSC20-23.
Without a writ of possession, the landlords cannot evict tenants from rental property and replace the defaulting tenants with new tenants.
The attorneys say with courts previously closed to the public, the challenge to enforce lease terms becomes nearly insurmountable. When the clerks of the courts are permitted to issue writs of possession, Arora predicts the courts will be flooded with commercial property eviction actions.
"In the Miami and the Brickell area, we've got bigger tenants that have not been paying rent. The rent is high," Arora said. "That area in South Florida will be affected more than any area in Palm Beach County or Broward County."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThese Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
6 minute readO'Melveny Secures Global Clearances for Korean Air-Asiana Merger
Big Law Leaders, Dealmakers Optimistic About M&A Deal Flow Under Trump, With Caveats
5 minute readDeal Watch: Are Only 'A Handful' of Law Firms Positioned Well After Citi-Apollo Partnership?
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250