Florida State Courts Get New Administrative Orders, 'Best Practices' Guidelines Amid COVID-19
The release, recommended by Canady's COVID-19 work group, adopted changes to guidelines for state court pandemic operations.
June 17, 2020 at 01:37 PM
3 minute read
Florida Supreme Court Chief Justice Charles Canady just updated two new administrative orders and the "best practices" memorandum. The release, recommended by Canady's COVID-19 work group, adopted changes to guidelines for state court pandemic operations.
Craig Waters, the director of the public information office for the Florida Supreme Court, said these actions are allowing Canady to gradually reopen state courts pending public health conditions.
"This is a subject that is changing rapidly as the pandemic progresses and new things are learned about its continuing impact on Florida's courts," Waters said.
Now individual state courts will have increasingly more power when applying the new administrative orders and the memorandum set out by the Florida Supreme Court as conditions are improving.
The first administrative order, AOSC20-23, updated one issued April 6 to provide comprehensive guidelines for state court operations in the coronavirus pandemic. The order replaced a statewide suspension of jury trials, and it now is allowing local variations when jury proceedings return.
The revised order empowered local chief judges to remove the suspension of jury trials 30 days following a transition to Phase 2 operations by the trial court circuit or a county within the circuit.
The second administrative order, AOSC20-32, updated a May 21 order that is now providing guidelines for state courts to transition to Phase 2. Phased 2 is characterized as limited in-person contact for selective purposes in state court and the usage of protective measures.
Phase 3 will broadly authorize a broader application of in-person contact, along with relaxed protective measures. While Phase 4 is when the coronavirus no longer posed a significant public health threat in state courts.
The third update by Canady is on the "best practices" memorandum, which was originally issued May 11 where the work group made recommendations for state court operations.
Included in the update are new guidelines on jury management amid the coronavirus pandemic, along with a recommendation that resuming civil and criminal jury trials have priority once they are authorized. It also described best practices in remote criminal cases on the management of trial evidence.
The work group has been essential in providing insight so Canady can update the state courts as the coronavirus brings uncertainty and required drastic steps to have state courts to partially remain open. The work group is chaired by Ninth Judicial Circuit Judge Lisa Taylor Munyon.
"The COVID-19 work group is making new recommendations to the chief justice whenever needed," Waters said. "Barely a week goes past without something new being issued. So stay tuned."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Families Settle Court Battle Over Who Owns Parkland Killer's Name, Likeness
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 2The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
- 3Law Firm Accused of Barratry for Allegedly Soliciting Crash Victims
- 4Carlton Fields Downsizes in Move to New Atlanta Office
- 5Trump's Selection of Zeldin to Head EPA Draws Surprise, Little Hope of Avoiding Deregulation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250