Legal Community Outraged by Suspected Hit on Mexican Judge and Wife
Federal Judge Uriel Villegas Ortiz handled high-profile cases and repeatedly rejected bids for release from custody.
June 17, 2020 at 01:25 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com International
A federal judge in Mexico who handled cases against high-ranking members of criminal gangs has been shot dead along with his wife at their home in the western state of Colima, sparking outrage in the country's legal community.
Though Mexico is plagued by growing drug-related violence and organized crime, the killing of a federal judge is unusual. Colima on the Pacific coast has become one of Mexico's deadliest because of its strategic location as a crossroads for the international drug trade dominated in the area by the Sinaloa cartel and splinter groups.
Supreme Court Chief Arturo Zaldívar interrupted a virtual court session Tuesday to announce the double-murder of Judge Uriel Villegas Ortiz and Verónica Barajas. The videotaped session shows concern spread across the faces of participants as Zaldívar laments the "terrible news" and asks for greater protection of judges.
Judges such as Villegas approve the detention of suspects in cases of organized crime and drug trafficking. Mexican media outlets reported Villegas transferred to Colima in February from the neighboring state of Jalisco, where he denied petitions to release numerous high-ranking members of organized crime.
Armed men reportedly stormed the couple's home but spared their two young daughters and a domestic employee.
Mexican Interior Minister Olga Sánchez, a former Supreme Court judge, said Wednesday that she knew Villegas personally. "He was doing his job, and he was doing it well," she said at a news conference. "He died for doing his job."
At the same event, President Andrés Manuel López Obrador promised to find and punish those responsible. "We will continue to confront delinquents," he said.
Colima is one of five Mexican states the U.S. State Department urges travelers to avoid. In June, the body of a missing Mexican congresswoman was found in a shallow grave more than a month after she was abducted by gunmen in Colima while raising awareness about the coronavirus pandemic.
Mexico's Federal Judiciary Board issued a statement saying its members, including circuit court judges, refuse to be intimated as they seek justice for Villegas, Barajas and others. "We won't stop, much less with intimidating acts," the board said.
Last year, the board evaluated 303 security requests from judges and magistrates. As of December, nearly 100 judges and magistrates in the country were under the protection of armed bodyguards, armored cars and bulletproof vests.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBrazil Is Quickly Becoming a Vital LatAm Market for Greenberg Traurig, Other US Law Firms
5 minute read'Would've Been Snoring Without Ya': Fort Lauderdale Jury Awards $4.5 Million in Condo Investment Spat
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250