When Will Florida Courts Reopen? Group Needs More Time To Figure Out Schedule
The order on June 15 allowed the Workgroup to continue four main functions instead of expiring June 30.
June 17, 2020 at 12:51 PM
3 minute read
Nearing the deadline, Florida Supreme Court Chief Justice Charles Canady issued a new administrative order extending the timeline for a group tasked with recommending a strategy for state courts to return to full operations during the coronavirus pandemic.
The chief judge moved the end date to Dec. 31, so the Workgroup on the Continuity of Court Operations and Proceedings During and After COVID-19 can continue its mission first designated by Canady.
The extension shows Canady does not presume that court operations will return to pre-COVID-19 operations within the next couple of weeks. The new deadline will give the chief justice insight to strategize the reopening of Florida courts while social distancing restrictions remain in effect.
The group is chaired by an Orlando area Circuit Judge Lisa Taylor and seeks to improve Florida courts' efficiency amid the coronavirus pandemic. Taylor said lawyers should be reassured by the new administrative order because the work group has accomplished the majority of changes in the time designated.
"Reviewing and recommending changes to the branch's pandemic and emergency operations materials, as well as considering recommendations for rule and statutory changes, are matters that should be well-vetted," Taylor said. "The extension of time will permit that process to proceed."
The order on June 15 allowed the work group to continue four main functions instead of expiring June 30, due to the "meaningful and significant contributions to the judicial branch's response to the pandemic," the administrative order stated.
The first extended function allows the group to pinpoint issues Canady should address in pandemic guidance material, along with other protocols and emergency procedures to strengthen governance and preparedness for future events.
The second goal is centered on the rules of the court. The group should propose temporary or long term amendments and petition the Florida Supreme Court to implement those changes.
The third mission is to recommend statutory changes that Canady could propose to the legislature in accordance with applicable state court system protocols.
The fourth is to respond to all other matters referred by to it by Canady.
|Read the Supreme Court of Florida administrative order:
|Florida courts have been operating under emergency orders since March 13. On that date, Canady suspended jury trials and took other actions restricting disease spreading activities in the state courts.
Just one month later, Canady established the 17-member work group in an administrative order to "recommend ways for a staged return to full-court operations as the course of the coronavirus pandemic changes in the months ahead."
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250