When Will Florida Courts Reopen? Group Needs More Time To Figure Out Schedule
The order on June 15 allowed the Workgroup to continue four main functions instead of expiring June 30.
June 17, 2020 at 12:51 PM
3 minute read
Nearing the deadline, Florida Supreme Court Chief Justice Charles Canady issued a new administrative order extending the timeline for a group tasked with recommending a strategy for state courts to return to full operations during the coronavirus pandemic.
The chief judge moved the end date to Dec. 31, so the Workgroup on the Continuity of Court Operations and Proceedings During and After COVID-19 can continue its mission first designated by Canady.
The extension shows Canady does not presume that court operations will return to pre-COVID-19 operations within the next couple of weeks. The new deadline will give the chief justice insight to strategize the reopening of Florida courts while social distancing restrictions remain in effect.
The group is chaired by an Orlando area Circuit Judge Lisa Taylor and seeks to improve Florida courts' efficiency amid the coronavirus pandemic. Taylor said lawyers should be reassured by the new administrative order because the work group has accomplished the majority of changes in the time designated.
"Reviewing and recommending changes to the branch's pandemic and emergency operations materials, as well as considering recommendations for rule and statutory changes, are matters that should be well-vetted," Taylor said. "The extension of time will permit that process to proceed."
The order on June 15 allowed the work group to continue four main functions instead of expiring June 30, due to the "meaningful and significant contributions to the judicial branch's response to the pandemic," the administrative order stated.
The first extended function allows the group to pinpoint issues Canady should address in pandemic guidance material, along with other protocols and emergency procedures to strengthen governance and preparedness for future events.
The second goal is centered on the rules of the court. The group should propose temporary or long term amendments and petition the Florida Supreme Court to implement those changes.
The third mission is to recommend statutory changes that Canady could propose to the legislature in accordance with applicable state court system protocols.
The fourth is to respond to all other matters referred by to it by Canady.
Read the Supreme Court of Florida administrative order:
Florida courts have been operating under emergency orders since March 13. On that date, Canady suspended jury trials and took other actions restricting disease spreading activities in the state courts.
Just one month later, Canady established the 17-member work group in an administrative order to "recommend ways for a staged return to full-court operations as the course of the coronavirus pandemic changes in the months ahead."
Read more:
'Viewed as a Success': Florida Supreme Court Sets Second Round of Virtual Arguments
Chief Justice Canady Releases 'Best Practices' for Florida Courts Amid COVID-19
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Lawyers' Reenactment Footage Leads to $1.5M Settlement
- 2People in the News—Feb. 4, 2025—McGuireWoods, Barley Snyder
- 3Eighth Circuit Determines No Standing for Website User Concerned With Privacy Who Challenged Session-Replay Technology
- 4Superior Court Re-examines Death of a Party Pending a Divorce Action
- 5Chicago Law Requiring Women, Minority Ownership Stake in Casinos Is Unconstitutional, New Suit Claims
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250