Preservationist Suing Over Planned Demolition of Ranch-Style Coral Gables House
The one-story house in affluent Coral Gables pits historic preservationists against the city and a member of a family that owns the Versailles restaurant.
June 19, 2020 at 05:14 PM
4 minute read
A plan by a member of Miami's Valls family, owners of the famous Versailles restaurant, to demolish a ranch-style Coral Gables house seemed imminent but another challenge is planned by preservationists.
The house at 1208 Asturia Ave. doesn't catch the eye with striking architecture in a city known for its ornate Mediterranean-style mansions. But the four-bedroom, three-bathroom house has historical claims.
The home built in 1937 was designed by influential Miami Beach architect Russell Pancoast, who also designed the Art Deco-style Bass museum building, and retains many of its original features.
Lourdes Valls, whose family runs the Versailles and La Carreta Cuban restaurants, bought the house for $875,000 in 2018.
Valls sought a city demolition permit as two municipal boards rejected preservationists' push to designate the house as historic.
Next-door neighbor Maria Cerda, who owns the house at 1216 Asturia Ave., is filing a writ of certiorari against the city asking the court to award a historic designation.
Miami attorney and civic activist David Winker, who represents Cerda, planned to file a petition Friday in Miami-Dade Circuit Court along with a request for an emergency injunction to stop the city from issuing the permit.
"We are bringing this lawsuit to ensure the city of Coral Gables, who has a long history of historic preservation, follows its own laws," Winker said. "This is another example of an unacceptable special deal for special people. This is not the first ranch-style house to be preserved."
City Attorney Miriam Soler Ramos said she couldn't comment on the writ specifically but maintained the city followed its own rules in denying a historic designation.
"The city strictly followed the provision of the zoning code relating to historic preservation and appeals, as well as all other pertinent regulations, and provided all parties with the due process afforded to them under the law," Ramos said in an email.
Valls in September asked the city Historical Resources & Cultural Arts Department for a historical significance determination, a procedural request before seeking demolition.
Interim Historic Preservation Officer Kara Kautz issued a recommendation in January in favor of a designation, but the Historic Preservation Board in March voted against it.
Cerda appealed to the City Commission, which on May 26 upheld the board vote.
Winker raised a due process argument, noting Mayor Raúl Valdés-Fauli sent a memo to historic board members before they first considered the item signaling his opposition.
Paul Savage, partner at Rasco Klock Perez & Nieto who represented Cerda in her appeal to the commission, questioned the board's independence, noting Valdés-Fauli has the power to appoint board members and weighs appeals on board decisions,
Valdés-Fauli, who didn't return a request for comment by deadline, recused himself from voting on the issue.
Arguments offered by Valls' architect focus mostly on the house's value and how expensive it would be to restore, Winker said.
"The writ of certiorari can be based on three categories: lack of due process, lack of following the essential requirements of the law and a lack of substantial competent evidence to support the decisions. It's very unusual to have all three as glaringly problematic," he said.
Valls' attorney, Gunster shareholder Mario Garcia-Serra in Miami, said she would continue her fight against historic designation.
"Ms. Valls is prepared to vigorously defend the city's denial of historic designation. As has been determined by both the Coral Gables Historic Preservation Board and the City Commission, the ranch home at 1208 Asturia is not a building which merits historic designation," Garcia-Serra said in an email.
Winker asked Ramos for a stay on the issuance of a demolition permit, citing a 30-day appeal window that expires next Thursday.
Ramos, the city attorney, said the city "in good faith" won't issue a permit until Tuesday to give Winker time to seek a court order staying the permit.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All830 Brickell is Open After Two-Year Delay That Led to Winston & Strawn Pulling Lease
3 minute readMiami Lawyers Beat Other Local Sectors, Attorneys Elsewhere in Office Usage
3 minute read'Would've Been Snoring Without Ya': Fort Lauderdale Jury Awards $4.5 Million in Condo Investment Spat
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1What to Know About Naming a Law Firm
- 2Texas Shows the Way Forward in Resolving Mass Tort Gridlock
- 3Ninth Circuit Rules on Inherent Authority and FRCP 37(e)
- 4Where CFPB Enforcement Stops Short on Curbing School Lunch Fees, Class Action Complaint Steps Up
- 5Appellate Court's Decision on Public Employee Pension Eligibility Helps the Judiciary
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250