This Broward Woman's Case Could Change the Way Hospitals, DCF Evaluate Disabled Parents
The mother's lawyer blames the Broward County Sheriff's Office for conducting child protective cases from a law enforcement perspective, rather than with a social welfare focus.
June 19, 2020 at 03:13 PM
4 minute read
Alysha Cesaire, a Broward woman suffering from spinal ataxia, filed a complaint against several government officials, citing her constant fear of losing her child because of her disability.
Now the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida will decide whether to amend policies that affect what happens to children born to mothers with disabilities, and if Cesaire should be awarded damages.
The dispute centers on allegations that hospital employees and an investigator from the Florida Department of Children and Families sought to put Cesaire's newborn in foster care because they alleged the parents were unable to care for the child.
Cesaire has a hereditary disease, which has affected her brain and caused uncoordinated walking and abnormal speech.
The complaint alleges that while Cesaire has caregivers, she fears Child Protective Services could place her child into the dependency system at any time based on an incident shortly after the baby's birth.
It claims people with disabilities are automatically disadvantaged in the dependency system because the risk assessment system does not consider the availability of family or friends to assist the parent.
Cesaire gave birth to her son two years ago. Soon after, based on a report from a hospital social worker, a child protective investigator was assigned to the case. Instead of discharging the mother and the child, the hospital held the newborn, according to the complaint.
The complaint alleges the investigator stated that the mother and father had displayed "cognitive delays," which would hinder them from meeting the newborn's basic needs.
The complaint stated that the investigator filed a shelter petition that a Broward judge later denied, finding no probable cause warranting issuance of an order directing shelter care. The order would have removed the child from the parents' custody, and placed the baby in shelter care, while still affording parents and siblings visitation rights, if appropriate.
Stacie Schmerling, a partner at Kelley Kronenberg in Fort Lauderdale, and Matthew Dietz, the litigation director of Disability Independence Group in Miami, represent Cesaire. They filed Cesaire's case against the Broward County Sheriff's Office and its Sheriff Gregory Tony, along with Chad Poppell, the secretary of the Florida Department of Children and Families.
The sheriff's office declined to comment, citing a policy of not commenting on ongoing litigation. And Poppell did not respond to a request for comment.
Read the full complaint:
|Even though the court denied the shelter petition, Cesaire alleged that her child could be taken from her at any time due to her disability, despite having caregivers at home. But the complaint stated that the social worker's concern about the child's welfare arose because both of Cesaire's parents work outside of the home full time, leaving Cesaire alone with the child for several hours per day.
Schmerling pointed to the Child Welfare Practice Model, where protective services grade parents from letters A to D. The letter A is the equivalent to excellent, while B, C, and D are progressively worse. People with disabilities, Schmerling said, are commonly graded the lowest letters due to their constraints, instead of focusing on their ability to satisfy a child's emotional needs.
"A parent without a disability might come in with an A rating and they actually abused or neglected their child," Schmerling said. "But parents with disabilities are already with a disadvantage without ever abusing or neglecting their child by virtue of their disability."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250