Ruling Proves Community Associations Need to Revise Own Governing Documents
A ruling in May by Florida's Third District Court of Appeal added to the growing string of decisions in recent years illustrating…
June 23, 2020 at 10:15 AM
4 minute read
A ruling in May by Florida's Third District Court of Appeal added to the growing string of decisions in recent years illustrating how an old and outdated provision in HOA and condominium association declarations is preventing some communities from collecting what they would be owed under the current state law from purchasers in foreclosure actions. The new and past rulings cry out for community associations to review and consider amending their declarations to avoid the prospect of shooting themselves in the foot with their buyer/lender-friendly provisions from prior ages.
The ruling came in the case of Old Cutler Lakes by the Bay Community Association v. SRP SUB. The LLC took title to a unit within the community via a mortgage foreclosure auction and subsequently filed an action for declaratory relief seeking to determine its liability for the association assessments that accrued prior to acquiring title.
While Florida law holds that a parcel owner is jointly and severally liable with the previous owner for all unpaid assessments that came due up to the time of transfer of title, including by purchase at a foreclosure sale, the LLC was apparently well aware that the association's declaration contained a provision that essentially extinguished its liability for the past-due assessments owed by the previous owner.
Old Cutler Lakes' declaration reads:
"The sale or transfer of any Lot pursuant to the foreclosure or any proceeding in lieu thereof of a first mortgage meeting the above qualifications, shall extinguish the lien of such assessments as to payments which became due prior to such sale or transfer."
The LLC's arguments did not end there. It also relied on the Third DCA's 2017 opinion in Beacon Hill Homeowners Association v. Colfin Ah-Florida 7, which addressed these same declaration provisions and cited a Fourth DCA ruling from 2015.
In the May ruling, the Third DCA panel concluded that the trial court's amended final judgment provided a thorough and well-reasoned analysis of the relevant provisions of the community's declaration and the application of the appellate court's 2017 decision in Beacon Hill. It found no error in the lower court's interpretation of the relevant provisions and affirmed the amended final judgment concluding the LLC is not liable for any of the past-due assessments, attorney's fees and/or costs that accrued prior to its acquiring title.
This ruling adds to the growing consensus among Florida's district courts of appeal that community associations' existing governing documents override Florida law placing liability on the new owner for the previous owner's past-due assessments.
While many community association governing documents mirror the language in the current Florida Condominium Act and Homeowner Association Act, there are numerous older communities with governing documents that extinguish a successor's liability for the previous owner's assessments. Those communities should consider amending their governing documents to allow them to collect from the eventual buyers of units at mortgage foreclosure sales and avoid complete write-offs of past assessments.
It is important to note that association governing documents can vary greatly, and the amendment procedure/mechanism will differ by community. Associations and their boards of directors should review their governing documents with the help of highly qualified condo and HOA attorneys to identify these outdated provisions. If an amendment is in order, the board and/or membership must vote to approve the amendment language and, if approved, record the amendment in the public records. Keep in mind that an amendment will only take effect after it is properly recorded in the public records and may not apply retroactively.
Addressing these dated provisions via effective amendments will surely yield significant future financial boons for many of Florida's older communities.
Maryvel De Castro Valdes is a shareholder with Siegfried Rivera in Coral Gables. She focuses on community association and real estate law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
4 minute readData Breaches, Increased Regulatory Risk and Florida’s New Digital Bill of Rights
7 minute readNavigating Florida's Products Liability Law: Defective Products, Warnings and the Pursuit of Justice
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Blake Lively's claims that movie co-star launched smear campaign gets support in publicist's suit
- 2Middle District of Pennsylvania's U.S. Attorney Announces Resignation
- 3Vinson & Elkins: Traditional Energy Practice Meets Energy Transition
- 4After 2024's Regulatory Tsunami, Financial Services Firms Hope Storm Clouds Break
- 5Trailblazing Pennsylvania Judge Sylvia Rambo Dies at 88
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250