Miami-Dade Courts Quickly Backtrack on Easing COVID-19 Rules
Conditions for court appearances called for "limited in-person contact," but those were withdrawn in favor of making even that "inadvisable."
June 25, 2020 at 04:32 PM
2 minute read
Miami-Dade Circuit Court backtracked Thursday on COVID-19 restrictions loosened only three days before as daily coronavirus case counts hit new records in Florida.
The temporary break had little effect because courthouses under the Phase 1 and Phase 2 rules remained closed to in-person appearances with few exceptions.
Under the most restrictive Phase 1 standard set by Florida Supreme Court Chief Justice Charles Canady, remote hearings were encouraged but courts were effectively closed to the public and in-person appearances were considered "inadvisable" and "rare."
Under the looser Phase 2 rules, "limited in-person contact is authorized for certain purposes and/or requires use of protective measures" based on a June 16 administrative order issued by Canady.
Safety precautions for court visitors under an order issued Monday by Miami-Dade Chief Judge Bertila Soto required face masks, social distancing, temperature checks and health screening questions at entrances.
Unfortunately, Florida COVID-19 cases boomed since then, including two days with over 5,000 new cases for the first time. Miami-Dade accounts for 25% of the state's cases, and South Florida has 46% of the Florida tally.
Palm Beach County issued an order requiring masks to be worn in public places starting Thursday.
As current court restrictions stand, any large-scale reopening of state courts is off until late July, and South Florida federal trials have been delayed until at least Aug. 31.
Read more:
Florida State Courts Get New Administrative Orders, 'Best Practices' Guidelines Amid COVID-19
Florida State Courts Delay Reopening Until Late July
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Families Settle Court Battle Over Who Owns Parkland Killer's Name, Likeness
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 12025 Will Be a Turning Point for Crypto Counselor Laura Brookover
- 2Bitcoin, Cryptocurrency Practices Stand to Gain from Trump Election
- 3Judge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
- 4Fighting Injustice: Son Secures Father's Honorable Discharge From U.S. Air Force
- 5'A Giant in the Legal Community': a Fulton County Judge Has Died
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250