Prevagen Ruling Could Provide Check on Competitive Field of Consumer Supplements
The nationwide settlement could be one of the largest consumer class settlements in the country and might award tens of millions in damages.
June 25, 2020 at 06:17 PM
3 minute read
A nationwide class action settlement was just reached involving approximately 3 million consumers of a popular supplement claiming to improve brain health. The settlement, which is subject to court approval, will provide those consumers with partial refunds, and the supplement will have a changed label.
Consumers of the supplement, Prevagen, said that Quincy Bioscience, the supplement maker, was deceptive in its advertisements claiming that the brain health supplement improved memory and "supported brain function, [a] sharper mind, and clearer thinking."
The ruling could provide a check on the competitive and lucrative field of consumer supplements that are not strictly regulated as drugs by the Food and Drug Administration. The cost of this settlement may limit future product claims on other supplements that cross the line between puffery and actual violation of various consumer protection laws.
The motion stated that the nationwide settlement could be one of the largest consumer class settlements in the country. It would resolve four different nationwide class actions pending in South Florida, Missouri, New York and California, awarding tens of millions in damages.
Now, U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman, who sits in Miami, will have to decide whether to issue a report and recommendation to grant preliminary approval and class certification of the proposed national consumer settlement.
Prevagen's active ingredient is a dietary protein, apoaequorin, which was first discovered in glowing jellyfish. The plaintiffs said that when the protein is digested, it is transformed into common amino acids that are no different from those derived from other dietary proteins. Plaintiffs also asserted that this protein "cannot cross the blood-brain barrier to reach the brain or affect its functioning."
Geoff Castillo, counsel for Quincy, declined to comment.
Under the settlement agreement, Quincy will offer class members refunds in various amounts based on a two-tier monetary relief structure, the motion stated.
|Read the motion to approve:
|Those with proof of purchase can obtain a cash refund of 30% of the Quincy manufacturer suggested retail price, up to $70 for an individual claimant. Those people without proof of purchase, but with a valid claim, can obtain a cash refund of $12.
Quincy has denied all allegations made against its popular brain health supplement. A recent jury trial in the Northern District of California with similar claims ended in a hung jury. The Northern District of California took the additional step of decertifying a class of California consumers who had purchased Prevagen brain health supplements.
Jack Scarola, a partner at Searcy Denney in West Palm Beach, and Adam Moskowitz of The Moskowitz Law Firm in Coral Gables, represented the plaintiffs in the Florida class action. And they said they are proud of the proposed settlement, which will still allow consumers to purchase the memory loss products knowing all the alleged risks and benefits.
"There is certainly a risk with any case going to trial as we saw in the other Prevagen case pending in California," Moskowitz said in an email. "This settlement provides real, substantive monetary value to millions of customers nationwide that would like to participate and receive refunds, and it provides more and better disclosures of the product."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Slaps $16 Million Penalty on Defendants in Wyndham Timeshare Advertising Fraud Case
4 minute readGibson Dunn Recruits S&C Partner to Co-Lead M&A Practice, in 2-Partner Hire
Consumer Class Action Accuses Fabletics of Misleading Customers of 'VIP Membership Program' Value
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250