Best Practices for Handling Crisis PR in the Chaotic World of COVID-19
If you are a news junkie like I am, you understand why I am on edge. It seems like almost every hour another national crisis unfolds right before our eyes; and the compounding effect has made us all a bit frenzied. If you are a lawyer with major clientele, you are certainly feeling the heat.
July 01, 2020 at 10:26 AM
4 minute read
If you are a news junkie like I am, you understand why I am on edge. It seems like almost every hour another national crisis unfolds right before our eyes; and the compounding effect has made us all a bit frenzied. If you are a lawyer with major clientele, you are certainly feeling the heat.
The wave of COVID-19 litigation is fast upon us.
It's no secret that the onset of this international pandemic crushed the U.S. labor market, causing business owners (like this one!) to do everything in their power to keep their businesses running: layoffs, closures, reduced salaries all in record numbers. Over 30 million people filed for unemployment within the first two months of the pandemic, and this rocking of our system has already generated a spike in COVID-19 related litigation. Unpaid overtime, workplace safety violations, layoff and discrimination grievances — to name a few — are all on the rise because of the virus. And with most states enacting reopening plans, many anticipate a higher uptick in lawsuits from sick workers and sick customers alike.
For lawyers, navigating all of this turmoil with grace, compassion and swift action will prove extremely important to the credibility of their practice, and the credibility of their clients. As businesses brace themselves for an onslaught of lawsuits, here are a few best practices for lawyers to master the art of crisis communications and manipulate the media to their advantage; or for these times, let's say — to keep things from getting worse — and that's possible.
Words matter. Even describing a situation as a crisis from the outset gives it a certain heaviness, for example. It is important to be extremely thoughtful, delicate and selective with your words—whether it be internally within the firm, in dialogue with your client, and in front of the media.
Social media is a powerful tool, and it moves at a fast clip. This time in lockdown has undoubtedly cemented the power of social media to all. For crisis communications, this means that the media is anticipating a statement immediately on social and can often cut into vital preparation time between the attorney and the client. It is essential to find the right midpoint between preparation time and expediency in posting something to the digital ether.
Do not wait for the media to come to you. The perceived legitimacy of social media now also means that one can no longer wait for a media inquiry, or to see what leads a press release garners. Social media empowers us all to control the story and gain momentum long before the media catches on — and on the flipside, our clients can be spoken about on social media by users at any point. We must be social media masters — preparing our clients expeditiously, utilizing the tool to our advantage, and closely tracking user comments and conversations about the client.
Be compassionate without apologizing. We are all experiencing a collective trauma right now, and we must lead with compassion. The standard, cool lawyerly demeanor may not be the most appropriate way to interface with the media right now. Be empathetic throughout your communications—it will go a long way. At the same time, stand firm in your position.
Be truthful about navigating unknown territory. Given the unprecedented nature of this time, lawyers and clients alike will not have all of the answers. I recommend being deferential to the unknown than saying something that you might later regret.
Though the coronavirus will hopefully be just a bad memory soon, the repercussions to our businesses — and the corresponding lawsuits — will be with us for much longer. So long as you can navigate these hurdles with thoughtfulness, compassion, social media prowess, and at a comfortably fast pace, you will be able to set up their clients for success.
Julie Talenfeld is the founder and CEO of BoardroomPR, one of the largest PR and integrated marketing agencies in Florida specializing in media relations, online marketing, branding, public affairs and crisis communications. The firm has offices in Fort Lauderdale, Tampa, Orlando, West Palm Beach, Naples and Miami.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250