New Faces Are Leading MDLs, and They Aren't All Men
Women made up 40% of lawyers leading four or more MDLs created from 2016 to 2019, according to Law.com research. Although most of the top firms remain the same, some have spread out appointments to several lawyers, including women.
July 06, 2020 at 10:53 PM
10 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
When lawyers were tossing around names to submit to the judge for a plaintiffs leadership team two years ago in a multidistrict litigation proceeding, Amy Keller at Chicago's DiCello Levitt threw her name in. After all, she had experience serving as co-lead counsel in the MDL over the Equifax data breach.
"One of the attorneys, who was a man, made the comment of how I had already been appointed co-lead counsel in two other cases, and he was concerned I would not be able to handle a third case," Keller recalled in an interview. "I found that very interesting because never in my career have I ever heard someone say, 'Oh, can he handle another case?' "
Keller said "thinly veiled sexism" still exists in the mass tort and class action bar. But for her part, she moved on to other cases and has obtained six MDL appointments in the course of four years.
Keller's trajectory as a woman in the male-dominated MDL bar might be exceptional, but an analysis of appointment orders for federal MDL proceedings initiated from 2016 to 2019 suggests her experience may exemplify a growing trend.
Women made up 40% of the 30 lawyers who received appointments to more than three MDLs during that period. The data gathered by Law.com show many large plaintiffs firms — once reliant on a single, often white male senior partner to lead the MDL practice — are spreading out appointments to a younger and a more diverse set of lawyers.
Keller tied with Melissa Emert, formerly of Stull, Stull & Brody and now at Kantrowitz, Goldhamer & Graifman, as the woman with the highest number of appointments for the review period. The most any attorney received was 10.
"These are bad-ass attorneys who are also women," said Mike Morgan of Morgan & Morgan in Orlando, which ranked second in MDL appointments with 16 going to six men and two women. "When we look at the way the MDLs form, it was largely done before anybody got to the courtroom: The stereotypical, with cigars and whiskey, and people deciding who goes where. Then they'd say, 'Judge, great news! We've decided.' That doesn't happen today."
One area that still lags: minority attorneys. While more nonwhite lawyers have gotten appointments, those at the very top are few. Of the top 30 on Law.com's list, only two identified as nonwhite.
|Women Making Inroads
Much has changed since five years ago when criticism mounted that "repeat players," mostly white male attorneys, got the bulk of the leadership appointments. Leadership teams are becoming more diverse, and women are increasingly getting lead counsel roles.
Law.com's research unveiled new faces spearheading the cases. True, many are at firms known for MDL work, and most are male and white — but not all.
The data does not account for the size of an MDL, practice area or the actual position on an MDL team, whether it is lead counsel or liaison counsel. It also reflects only MDLs where judges issued orders. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, which manages the creation of MDLs, does not publish data on attorney leadership appointments.
Law.com conducted its analysis by reviewing appointment orders issued by judges in 75 MDLs instantiated from 2016 to 2019. In tabulating the rankings, appointments to individual cases were counted only once even if an attorney was appointed to multiple leadership positions. Gender and ethnic diversity data was determined using names, public profile pictures and by contacting attorneys directly. Due to limits in available data, the analysis was not able to factor in sexual orientation diversity.
Elizabeth Burch, a professor at the University of Georgia School of Law, compiled similar research for her 2015 article "Judging Multidistrict Litigation," which found judges overwhelmingly appointed "repeat players" in MDLs. At that time, her list of 50 top MDL attorneys focused on cases involving products liability and sales practices was 22% women.
Progress, she said, "seems really slow."
"When I talked to people about this many years ago, back around 2015, maybe 2016," she said, "the story I got as to why women weren't more front and center … was that each firm had a go-to big name. So even if the women had lots of experience and had done a lot of work in the trenches, they were never the name put forth by the firm."
Elizabeth Cabraser of San Francisco's Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, one of top women attorneys in MDLs, said that's no longer the case, at least for some firms. Among her firm's 19 MDL appointments, she is handling three. Another six women and five men are taking on the other cases.
"Some firms are all about the person at the top, usually a guy," Cabraser said in an interview. "Other firms have made a more conscious effort to advance the careers of their partners, including women partners, other partners coming up, and partners of color. We're beginning to see that happen."
Ben Hancock contributed data analysis for this report.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Commission Confirms Three of Newsom's Appellate Court Picks
- 2Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 3GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 4'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 5Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250