Blueprint for Litigation: How Costco Overcame a $775,000 Award in an Employment Lawsuit
"I would reverse the judgment as a matter of law," Judge Charles R. Wilson wrote in his dissent.
July 08, 2020 at 02:53 PM
5 minute read
Costco Wholesale Corp. won in federal court, beating back a lawsuit by a sympathetic plaintiff.
And it did so by building a case centered on showing it had taken several steps to comply with federal law, and to accommodate a deaf employee.
But it was long road, which led to a divided U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Costco's favor.
Plaintiffs counsel Beverly A. Pohl of Nelson Mullins in Fort Lauderdale represented former Costco employee, Christine D'Onofrio, who said she had loved her job and performed well for years until conditions soured under a new manager. She argued the company had not accommodated her client's deafness under the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992.
A jury sided with the plaintiff, awarding D'Onofrio $750,000 in damages for emotional pain and mental anguish, and $25,000 in punitive damages.
But Costco responded with a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law. The court conditionally granted its motion for a new trial, agreeing with Costco that no reasonable jury could have found the company had failed to provide reasonable accommodation to D'Onofrio.
A federal appellate panel also sided with the company.
"We agree with the district court that there was insufficient evidence to support the failure-to-accommodate claim," the Eleventh Circuit ruled. "Therefore, we affirm the district court's grant of judgment as a matter of law to Costco, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b). In light of this holding, we need not address D'Onofrio's second appeal related to the court's conditional grant of Costco's new-trial motion."
Judge Charles R. Wilson disagreed.
"I would reverse the judgment as a matter of law, as the jury was well within its prerogative to accept D'Onofrio's evidence over Costco's and make credibility determinations," the judge wrote in his dissent.
|Action taken
D'Onofrio's complaint alleged she began having problems at the Pompano Beach Costco warehouse. It stated that Alan Pack, D'Onofrio's manager, mumbled when he spoke, which made lip reading impossible for D'Onofrio. The suit also claimed Pack refused to communicate in writing and that he ridiculed the employee for communicating with her hands.
D'Onofrio then took the concerns to Pack's superiors, using the "open-door policy," where she informed them that his treatment caused her "great mental, physical, and emotional stress," according to court documents. In response, Costco CEO Craig Jelinek and Vice President Steve Powers reached out to schedule a meeting with D'Onofrio, so she could voice her complaints.
In a meeting with Powers and a member of the human resource team, D'Onofrio requested that Pack be transferred to a different Costco warehouse and all managers be trained on deaf culture. However, the opinion noted that D'Onofrio did not ask for accommodations to help her communicate with Pack.
Immediately after the meeting, Costco implemented several measures, including video remote interpreting equipment, and providing remote online sign language interpreters, who could facilitate communication between a deaf individual and a hearing individual by way of a video phone call. Costco installed the equipment at two locations in the warehouse, and ensured D'Onofrio received training for the new equipment.
At trial, Costco introduced witnesses, such as Dr. Shana Williams, the director of the Center for Hearing and Communication, who testified about the effectiveness of the new equipment to facilitate communication between D'Onofrio and her managers during group sessions.
|Read the Eleventh Circuit opinion:
|Costco also followed up on D'Onofrio's request for deaf-culture training by arranging instruction from the Center for Hearing and Communication in Fort Lauderdale. The managers in D'Onofrio's immediate chain of command attended the session. Williams made several suggestions to assist D'Onofrio in large group meetings.
Soon after, Costco transferred a new direct supervisor that had a close relative who was deaf and was familiar with the new equipment. The opinion stated their relationship soon deteriorated as the new supervisor repeatedly accused D'Onofrio of being "loud, angry and insubordinate."
D'Onofrio was coached and counseled on a number of occasions for inappropriate and insubordinate behavior, and she frequently refused to use the new equipment. Soon afterward, D'Onofrio was suspended and later fired for excessive policy violations.
A jury at a lower court ruled in D'Onofrio favor for Costco's failure to accommodate claim under the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, awarding D'Onofrio $750,000 for emotional pain and mental anguish, and $25,000 in punitive damages, the court ultimately ruled for Costco as a matter of law, causing the award to be set aside. The Eleventh Circuit affirmed that ruling.
John T. Murray, a partner for Seyfarth in Atlanta who represented Costco, did not respond to request for comment.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Bankruptcy Filings Rise 16.2% as Interest Rates, Inflation, and End of COVID Relief Hit Hard
3 minute readBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250