'Substantial Uncertainty': Law Firm View With PPP Money Dwindling and Virus Spreading
Law firms pocketed millions of dollars from the federal Paycheck Protection Program. But as the money runs out and COVID-19 cases keep climbing, law firms realize they are not out of the woods yet.
July 09, 2020 at 03:29 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Law firms have been relieved that the COVID-19 pandemic has not been as financially catastrophic for the industry as predicted in March, but the coming months will bring more uncertainty for firms and the broader economy as Paycheck Protection Program loans run out and coronavirus cases keep rising in the United States.
Most of the PPP money, which was intended to cover salaries for up to 2.5 months, went out in April. More than 1,500 law firms across the United States signed up, and at least 47 Am Law 200 firms received loans totaling $218 million to $445 million based on the dollar ranges issued by the Small Business Administration, which administers the program.
Nearly two months after most loans were issued, though, firm leaders and legal observers say firms aren't out of the woods yet.
"There's still substantial uncertainty around the 'second wave' and the long-term economic impact," said Sullivan & Worcester managing partner Joel Carpenter. "Supplemental unemployment is up at the end of the month. We're cautiously optimistic, but we still don't know where all this is going to take us."
PPP money allowed his firm to weather the pandemic's initial impact without instituting broad layoffs. Instead, employees who made more than $66,000 per year saw a 5% pay cut, and partners saw a double-digit reduction in their draws. The firm furloughed fewer than 10 employees who were unable to do their jobs remotely.
While Sullivan & Worcester brought back half of its furloughed staff, those jobs are tied to recent reopenings in New York. Some states, in response to the rising tide of coronavirus cases in June and July, have either paused or reversed their reopening plans.
Florida notched more than 11,000 daily cases for a second time Friday in the state's deadliest week as fatalities climbed past 4,100. Four-digit daily climbs in cases have been the norm for more than a month, taking the total above 244,000, including more than 17,000 hospitalizations and pushing intensive care usage above 80%. In the hardest-hit county, Miami-Dade Mayor Carlos Giménez responded with an order Thursday reinstating a ban on indoor dining.
Texas, Arizona, California and South Carolina are among other large states seeing upticks in cases, and U.S. industries continue to be hammered by the pandemic months into the virus fight. United Airlines announced Wednesday that it may furlough up to 40% of its staff, or 36,000 workers, on Oct. 1 even after receiving much of the $25 billion in airline stimulus funding allotted by Congress in March.
"The problem is that [PPP] is a short-term fix," said Paul Hastings partner Christopher Austin, who advises on PPP applications. "Anytime you can get funds in the door in a time of uncertainty, it gives the people more opportunities to get people employed. Whether or not that will last will depend on how people are doing now."
As with United Airlines, several firms that received PPP stimulus loans have announced pay cuts and furloughs. Hughes Hubbard & Reed laid off an undisclosed number of attorneys and staff Tuesday, despite receiving a loan $5 million to $10 million.
In a statement to Law.com, the firm said that while the PPP loan helped "to save jobs during the worst of the crisis," the "deep impact of court closures and a slowdown in deal activity" three months after the pandemic first began forced its hand.
A few firms that did not draw down PPP loans also announced austerity measures in June. New York's Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, which had a standout 2019, said it would offer voluntary buyouts to staffers. Denver-based Holland & Hart announced broad pay cuts for both partners and staff.
And while layoffs and cuts are discouraged for those receiving PPP funds by being linked to loan forgiveness, there's nothing that would stop a firm from laying off employees after the money is spent and its loan forgiveness has been approved.
Gretta Rusanow, head of advisory services for the Citi Law Firm Group, said that among the 60 firms she collects data and projections from, two-thirds are projecting median revenue declines of 5% in the third quarter. The firms, including almost half of the Am Law 100 and several firms in the Am Law 200, also project a median 5% drop in demand and 5% lengthening of collections.
Rusanow said firms were initially pessimistic in their projections amid the pandemic. When asked to project second-quarter demand at the beginning of the quarter, a similar sample of law firms estimated a median demand drop of 15%. By June, the firms moderated their projections to just 7%. Revenue among the group saw a median quarterly decline of 1%, although Rusanow notes results varied greatly.
"What I've seen from this sample is that Q2 was better than expected, and firms went into the months very concerned," Rusanow said. "Going into Q3 there is an anticipated drop in revenue, but we may as well see a moderation as we go into the quarter."
Read more:
Miami-Dade Restaurants 'Disheartened' by Second Order to Close as COVID-19 Numbers Climb
3 Florida Law Firms Grab Millions in PPP Loans Along With Dozens of Others
Forgiveness for the Unforgiven: Small Business Chapter 11 Solution for Adverse PPP Loan Outcomes
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
6 minute readRFK Jr. Will Keep Affiliations With Morgan & Morgan, Other Law Firms If Confirmed to DHHS
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250