'Substantial Uncertainty': Law Firm View With PPP Money Dwindling and Virus Spreading
Law firms pocketed millions of dollars from the federal Paycheck Protection Program. But as the money runs out and COVID-19 cases keep climbing, law firms realize they are not out of the woods yet.
July 09, 2020 at 03:29 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Law firms have been relieved that the COVID-19 pandemic has not been as financially catastrophic for the industry as predicted in March, but the coming months will bring more uncertainty for firms and the broader economy as Paycheck Protection Program loans run out and coronavirus cases keep rising in the United States.
Most of the PPP money, which was intended to cover salaries for up to 2.5 months, went out in April. More than 1,500 law firms across the United States signed up, and at least 47 Am Law 200 firms received loans totaling $218 million to $445 million based on the dollar ranges issued by the Small Business Administration, which administers the program.
Nearly two months after most loans were issued, though, firm leaders and legal observers say firms aren't out of the woods yet.
"There's still substantial uncertainty around the 'second wave' and the long-term economic impact," said Sullivan & Worcester managing partner Joel Carpenter. "Supplemental unemployment is up at the end of the month. We're cautiously optimistic, but we still don't know where all this is going to take us."
PPP money allowed his firm to weather the pandemic's initial impact without instituting broad layoffs. Instead, employees who made more than $66,000 per year saw a 5% pay cut, and partners saw a double-digit reduction in their draws. The firm furloughed fewer than 10 employees who were unable to do their jobs remotely.
While Sullivan & Worcester brought back half of its furloughed staff, those jobs are tied to recent reopenings in New York. Some states, in response to the rising tide of coronavirus cases in June and July, have either paused or reversed their reopening plans.
Florida notched more than 11,000 daily cases for a second time Friday in the state's deadliest week as fatalities climbed past 4,100. Four-digit daily climbs in cases have been the norm for more than a month, taking the total above 244,000, including more than 17,000 hospitalizations and pushing intensive care usage above 80%. In the hardest-hit county, Miami-Dade Mayor Carlos Giménez responded with an order Thursday reinstating a ban on indoor dining.
Texas, Arizona, California and South Carolina are among other large states seeing upticks in cases, and U.S. industries continue to be hammered by the pandemic months into the virus fight. United Airlines announced Wednesday that it may furlough up to 40% of its staff, or 36,000 workers, on Oct. 1 even after receiving much of the $25 billion in airline stimulus funding allotted by Congress in March.
"The problem is that [PPP] is a short-term fix," said Paul Hastings partner Christopher Austin, who advises on PPP applications. "Anytime you can get funds in the door in a time of uncertainty, it gives the people more opportunities to get people employed. Whether or not that will last will depend on how people are doing now."
As with United Airlines, several firms that received PPP stimulus loans have announced pay cuts and furloughs. Hughes Hubbard & Reed laid off an undisclosed number of attorneys and staff Tuesday, despite receiving a loan $5 million to $10 million.
In a statement to Law.com, the firm said that while the PPP loan helped "to save jobs during the worst of the crisis," the "deep impact of court closures and a slowdown in deal activity" three months after the pandemic first began forced its hand.
A few firms that did not draw down PPP loans also announced austerity measures in June. New York's Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, which had a standout 2019, said it would offer voluntary buyouts to staffers. Denver-based Holland & Hart announced broad pay cuts for both partners and staff.
And while layoffs and cuts are discouraged for those receiving PPP funds by being linked to loan forgiveness, there's nothing that would stop a firm from laying off employees after the money is spent and its loan forgiveness has been approved.
Gretta Rusanow, head of advisory services for the Citi Law Firm Group, said that among the 60 firms she collects data and projections from, two-thirds are projecting median revenue declines of 5% in the third quarter. The firms, including almost half of the Am Law 100 and several firms in the Am Law 200, also project a median 5% drop in demand and 5% lengthening of collections.
Rusanow said firms were initially pessimistic in their projections amid the pandemic. When asked to project second-quarter demand at the beginning of the quarter, a similar sample of law firms estimated a median demand drop of 15%. By June, the firms moderated their projections to just 7%. Revenue among the group saw a median quarterly decline of 1%, although Rusanow notes results varied greatly.
"What I've seen from this sample is that Q2 was better than expected, and firms went into the months very concerned," Rusanow said. "Going into Q3 there is an anticipated drop in revenue, but we may as well see a moderation as we go into the quarter."
|Read more:
Miami-Dade Restaurants 'Disheartened' by Second Order to Close as COVID-19 Numbers Climb
3 Florida Law Firms Grab Millions in PPP Loans Along With Dozens of Others
Forgiveness for the Unforgiven: Small Business Chapter 11 Solution for Adverse PPP Loan Outcomes
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readTrump's Lawyers Speak Out: 'The President Had the Confidence to Retain Me'
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250