Litigation Trend: Florida Hotels Sued Over Human Trafficking
Florida is among the top states in the country for the commercial sexual exploitation of children, according to the complaint.
July 10, 2020 at 03:30 PM
4 minute read
A lawsuit filed late Thursday evening in federal court in Florida reflects a growing litigation trend: a move under federal law to assign liability to businesses used in human trafficking.
The complaint has accused a Broward County hotel company of being complicit in the trafficking and sexual exploitation of a minor, and is seeking to hold it financially accountable.
Justin D. Grosz, a partner at Kelley Kronenberg's Fort Lauderdale office and a leader of the firm's Justice for Kids division, accused Hotel Motel Inc. of profiting from the sexual exploitation of then 17-year-old Lynn Doe, under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act.
Amended in 2008, Grosz said victims could sue the trafficker and "those who know or should have known what was going on."
The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. It stated that Florida is among the top destination for the commercial sexual exploitation of children.
And more victims are filing civil lawsuits, including one filed in Southwest Florida this year.
In that litigation, two victims are seeking $100 million from 22 hotels, accused of being aware of human trafficking on their premises, but doing nothing to stop it.
Now, Grosz said a federal judge would determine if Hotel Motel should be financially held accountable.
The complaint stated that Hotel Motel was on notice that there is a systematic problem in the hospitality industry related to the human trafficking of minors. It alleges Hotel Motel was aware that sexual exploitation was prevalent in Broward County and within the vicinity of its establishment, The Lafayette Motel.
Jai and Jessica Motwani own Hotel Motel. They are related to the Motwani family that owns the real estate development firm, Merrimac Ventures, but despite having the same last name, Hotel Motel has no financial connection.
An attorney for Hotel Motel did not respond to a request for comment.
The complaint stated that Hotel Motel was required to educate and train its employees, and develop policies and practices to prevent human trafficking.
The victim, who was living in a foster care shelter before she was sold to a sex trafficker in 2012, moved to Lafayette because it was the base of the operation, according to the court pleading.
The traffickers were referred to as subjects one, two and three in the complaint, which said they advertised Doe online by taking photos of her in one of the Lafayette rooms.
The traffickers forced Doe to perform commercial sexual acts with between 15 and 20 men each day, the lawsuit claimed.
The complaint claimed Doe, who was allegedly drugged, was constantly meeting with these men on the premises in the direct "observation and supervision" of the general manager and other employees.
|Read the complaint:
|The complaint also alleged the general manager had sex with Doe in his room at Lafayette, as well as in rooms rented by two of the alleged traffickers.
Meanwhile, law enforcement was actively looking for the missing minor, and the general manager, when questioned by law enforcement, claimed the minor was no longer there, the pleading claimed.
Grosz, however, has maintained contact with his client and has disclosed her location to law enforcement.
Grosz said the implications and application of the Trafficking Act is not just for hotels, but group homes where foster kids in the welfare system are vulnerable.
"If you go after the traffickers, you can also go after those who were complicit or financially benefiting, and we are going to do that," Grosz said. "We had enough of our kids being trafficked. It's time to clean that up and protect them."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Close Our Borders?' Senate Judiciary Committee Examines Economics, Legal Predicate for Mass Deportation Proposal
3 minute readBig Law Assembles as Cruise Lines Clinch Partial Victory in $439M Havana Docks Suit
Marriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1How I Made Law Firm Leadership: 'It’s Imperative That You Never Stop Learning,' Says Ian Ribald of Ballard Spahr
- 2People in the News—Dec. 30, 2024—Pond Lehocky, Buchanan Ingersoll
- 3Orange Belongs to All: U-Haul Suit Argues Rival Public Storage Cannot Claim the Color
- 4Continuing Consolidation: The Biggest Legal Tech M&As of 2024
- 5FTC Announces HSR Final Rulemaking Impacting Premerger Filings
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250