Florida High on List as NY Steps Up Enforcement of Quarantine for Travelers
Air travelers to New York could face a $2,000 fine for refusing to provide their contact information.
July 14, 2020 at 06:06 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Aiming to bolster quarantine enforcement, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo announced air travelers from states like Florida with significant coronavirus spread must provide their contact information or face a $2,000 fine.
Besides the fine, air travelers who refuse to give the information could be brought to a hearing and ordered to complete a mandatory quarantine, the governor said Monday.
"We can't be in a situation where we have people coming from other states in the country bringing the virus," Cuomo said.
It's unclear if the intensified enforcement will lead to new legal challenges.
Last month, New York required people entering the state to self-quarantine for 14 days after arrival if they are coming from states with significant coronavirus spread.
The move was codified in an executive order, which stipulated that a violation of a quarantine or isolation order could lead to a $10,000 civil penalty.
The order applies to people traveling from states with a positive test rate of more than 10 per 100,000 residents or exceeding a weekly rolling average of 10% positive test results. Florida laboratory results for the week of July 5 landed above 20%, and state cases pushed past 300,000 Wednesday.
As of Tuesday, the quarantine requirement applies to people coming to New York from Florida and 21 other states across the nation, including California and Texas.
An emergency health order Monday stated all travelers subject to the executive order must complete a travel form. The electronic form asks for their name, phone number, date of arrival in New York and their method of transportation into the state, among other information.
Mary Beth Quaranta Morrissey, an attorney who focuses on health and public health law, said the state's moves highlight the dynamic between public health protection and civil liberties, but the efforts by the Cuomo administration are on sound legal ground.
"We're not operating under normal conditions," she said.
Cheryl Kraus, an attorney at Rivera Law in Albany, New York, said public health orders have been used previously. But now she said there's more attention being paid to the state's moves because they impact more people and the pandemic response has been politicized.
Aairlines will distribute the forms on the plane, and they will also be available online, Cuomo said Monday.
"You must give officials at the airport your form, as to where you came from and where you're going, before you leave the airport," he said. It will be enforced at every airport in the state.
James Lytle, senior counsel at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips in Albany, said a legal challenge solely over the requested contact information would not be successful in court.
But the quarantine mandate could be tougher to defend in certain situations, he said. That could be a situation where a traveler from a designated state was forced to quarantine in New York even though they came from a remote area with a low infection rate and were able to show they posed no risk, he said.
To safely quarantine, a person must not be in public and must have the ability to self-quarantine from others in the household as soon as symptoms develop, according to interim guidance from the state Department of Health. It said food should be delivered to the person's quarantine quarters, too.
A federal lawsuit challenged Cuomo's authority to require people to quarantine if they come to New York from certain states. It was brought by an Arizona resident who planned to fly to New York to help pack up a home.
Read more:
The New COVID-19 Wrinkle: In-Person Mediation Sparks Concerns
Big Key West Hospitality Company Sues Insurer for Unpaid Coronavirus Claims
Latin America M&A Activity Crashes to Record Lows in Pandemic
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readAs Unpredictability Rises, Gov't Law Practices Expect Trump Bump. Especially in Florida
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 2States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 3Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 4Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 5Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250