Advancing Diversity and Inclusion in the Legal Profession: 'We Can Do Better'
Many of us have worked for decades to advance diversity and inclusion in the legal profession. We started our fight early in our careers and continue to work to effectuate real change throughout our evolution. What is at stake is significant: equality; empathy; trust; a sense of belonging.
July 20, 2020 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Many of us have worked for decades to advance diversity and inclusion in the legal profession. We started our fight early in our careers and continue to work to effectuate real change throughout our evolution. What is at stake is significant: equality; empathy; trust; a sense of belonging.
It is unquestionably important for the legal profession to be diverse and inclusive to adequately represent and serve the many communities that form our society. Despite this, increasing diversity in the legal profession, especially in the upper ranks, has progressed slowly. Throughout my career, I have seized opportunities to advance women and minorities, and to understand and pursue effective strategies for progress.
An early instance occurred in 1999 when I participated in the Cuban American Bar Association's efforts, under the direction of then-CABA board member and later president Victor A. Diaz, to maintain Florida's hybrid system of electing local judges and appointing judges. I was tasked with debating on public television those professionals who sought to limit the selection of judges by the Judicial Nominating Commission. CABA and others successfully opposed the plan as it gave the members of the JNC too much power. My concern was that the proposed plan would be at odds with increasing the number of minorities and women serving on the bench in Florida and would make the process very political. Although the system of electing trial judges is certainly not perfect, I still support a hybrid system.
Another meaningful example of my sustained determination to increase the diversity of our judiciary happened throughout 2005. That year, I traveled on a monthly basis with attorney Luis E. Suarez, then a CABA board member, to meet with leaders of the voluntary bar associations to increase the diversity of the Broward Circuit Court trial bench. The Broward bench did not reflect the rich diversity of the community. The voluntary bars worked together to encourage then-Gov. Jeb Bush to appoint minorities to the bench. Bush answered the call and appointed numerous qualified minority candidates. Unfortunately, the next election wiped out a lot of those gains. We need to do more to educate voters about the importance of local judicial races.
I have served as the managing partner of my firm Kozyak, Tropin & Throckmorton, during two terms: in 2011-2012 and 2018-2019. The number of emails and letters of support I received for that appointment was astonishing. During my first term, there were very few women serving as managing partners. KTT, however, has been strategic and intentional about providing a path for advancement for women and minorities. I was not the first minority appointed to lead the firm and I was not the last. In fact, Javier A. Lopez, 2017 CABA president, is KTT's current managing partner.
Many of you reading this will not be surprised by these developments as one of KTT's founders, John W. Kozyak, has made diversity the hallmark of our firm. He has devoted his entire career to mentoring and promoting women and minorities. Since its inception, KTT's core values have been diversity, inclusion and excellence. Those values are reflected in the composition and caliber of our partners and attorneys. In my opinion, we are at a turning point in the legal profession in which naming a minority as managing partner should be expected, and is advisable for any firm that wants to be viewed as forward-thinking. Every firm has a personality and the person leading the firm will set the tone.
I believe it is critical for leaders within law firms to work every day on ensuring that their organizations are diverse and reflect the communities they serve, and are inclusive, providing opportunities for advancement and mentorship. It is equally important for firms to work with other firms and organizations in the legal industry to achieve real sustained progress in the advancement of diversity and inclusion in the legal profession. Working together we can achieve more and at a greater scale. There is nothing more powerful than leaders and organizations working collectively towards the same goal to change the status quo.
Currently, I serve as the president of the Florida Association of Managing Partners, an organization comprised of managing partners from midsized law firms in Florida. I am proud of the statement that FAMP issued earlier this month, and the commitment of the 20 law firms who signed on to the statement to recognize that diversity and inclusion are more important than ever in light of the recent social unrest and ensuing protests.
As the statement concludes, "lawyers are trained to argue, debate and advocate. At this time, however, we need to listen more than we need to talk. We need and want to do more. We need to embrace diversity of thought. We need to be kind to one another. We need to take steps to make sure that the legal profession, at all levels, reflects the rich diversity of our community. We can do better. We must do better. We will do better."
We have made progress, but we need to do more. As leaders, it is our responsibility to push for the continued evolution within our organizations and to find ways to work together to provide diverse people a sense of belonging to our legal community.
Corali Lopez-Castro is president of the Florida Association of Managing Partners and a partner at Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton in Coral Gables. She focuses her practice on insolvency and commercial litigation matters. Contact her at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllData Breaches, Increased Regulatory Risk and Florida’s New Digital Bill of Rights
7 minute readNavigating Florida's Products Liability Law: Defective Products, Warnings and the Pursuit of Justice
6 minute readNavigating Florida Property Insurance Claims in a Post-Fee-Shifting World
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250