Should Miami Attorneys, Architect Remain on Development Review Task Force?
The Florida Commission on Ethics issued a draft advisory opinion outlining potential conflicts of interest for appointees to Miami 21 review committee.
July 20, 2020 at 04:46 PM
4 minute read
An initiative to overhaul the sweeping Miami 21 zoning code turned contentious with the appointment of developers' attorneys to the review committee.
The state Ethics Commission in a draft advisory opinion determined the Miami 21 task force members are public officers subject to the state code of ethics. With two exceptions, it prohibits public officers from having a contractual relationship with any business before an agency on which the officers serve.
The Ethics Commission considered a hypothetical before members were appointed. The opinion stopped short of finding a conflict of interest for task force members representing big-name developers seeking approval of pending projects.
Members include land use attorneys Iris Escarra, shareholder at Greenberg Traurig; Vicky Leiva, partner at Bilzin Sumberg; and Melissa Tapanes Llahues, shareholder at Bercow Radell Fernandez Larkin & Tapanes. Most recently, issues also have been raised with the appointment of Bernardo Fort-Brescia, founding principal of prominent architectural firm Arquitectonica.
He equated the appointees to "foxes guarding the chicken coop," saying the attorneys represented special interest groups that would benefit from looser, pro-building regulations.
Escarra is a city-registered lobbyist for 80 clients, Tapanes for 79 and Leiva for 70.
"Anyone looking at this task force full of lobbyists and special interests knows that this is wrong," Winker said Monday by email. "If anyone is wondering why bad things keep happening in the city of Miami — giving away Melreese Park in a no-bid deal, developers building houses 6 inches apart with impunity — this is where it all starts."
The city is working on a no-bid lease with Miami's Major League Soccer group led by David Beckham with backing from corporate executives for the city-owned Melreese golf course and is in the middle of a court battle over the developer's alleged setback violations.
Tapanes declined comment Monday but responded when Winker raised the issue, saying task force members are "intimately familiar" with Miami 21 but have no official authority.
"The City Commission has taken special care to ensure that a fair cross-section of interests are represented, keeping in mind that every stakeholder may have an inherent bias or position they represent as a result of their education and experience," she said in February. "Using Mr. Winker's logic, no person who has ever worked with Miami 21 or is interested in the outcome of this public process would qualify to serve on this task force.
Escarra and Leiva didn't return requests for comment by deadline.
|State Opinion
The Ethics Commission opinion determined two exceptions to conflict of interest rules covering two seats are specifically for land use attorneys.
The City Commission can waive any other members' conflicts with a super-majority four-fifths vote, which is what commissioners are set to consider Thursday.
Winker said Escarra and Leiva were appointed to the land-use seats. Fort-Brescia, who is a city lobbyist for eight clients, wasn't appointed to the seat reserved for a certified architect as that appointment went to Kobi Karp. Fort-Brescia didn't return a request for comment
Both Tapanes and Fort-Brescia need the commission's super-majority vote to keep their seats.
"The Florida Commission on Ethics told the city these are prohibited conflicts of interest, and the city attorney's response is to waive the conflicts by a four-fifths vote by the very commissioners that appointed these lobbyists in the first place," Winker said.
The city attorney recommended waiving any potential conflicts for all nine appointees other than Escarra, Leiva and Karp.
The task force is to recommend changes to the decade-old zoning code to better address sea level rise, affordable crisis and special area plans, or SAPs.
SAPs are among the more contentious items as they let developers of more than 9 acres build more than normally allowed in exchange for public benefits such as park space or affordable housing. The provision has pitted developers and their attorney against residents and activists who complain about gentrification, added traffic and higher housing costs as unwanted results.
SAPs cover Little Haiti's Magic City Innovation District and the proposed Eastside Ridge project nearby.
Read the state opinion:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Nelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
- 2Immunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
- 3How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 4Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 5Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250