5 Questions for Miami-Dade Circuit Judicial Candidate Carmen Cabarga
Get to know Miami attorney Carmen Cabarga, who's running for judge against Roderick "Rod" Vereen in the August primary election.
July 21, 2020 at 03:53 PM
5 minute read
Carmen Cabarga, defense attorney at the Office of Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel in Miami, is running for Miami-Dade Circuit judge, Group 57 in the August primary elections. Here's what she says qualifies her for the judgeship. Responses have been edited for style and content.
Her opponent, Miami criminal, civil and appellate litigator Roderick "Rod" D. Vereen, did not respond to requests for answers. Vereen practices at the Law Office of Rod Vereen & Associates, and is a former prosecutor, public defender and past president of the Wilkie D. Ferguson Jr. Bar Association.
Related: 2020 South Florida Elections: Use this Voter Guide to Learn More About Candidates Running for Judge
|
Carmen Cabarga
Cabarga is a defense attorney with the Office of Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel in Miami. She's also a former litigator and prosecutor, and has served as an attorney for the city of Miami Community Redevelopment Agency for Overtown/Omni/Midtown.
Why are you running for this position?
I am driven by a desire to help others. I know that serving is my true measure of success. This is where my gratification and self worth reside. This is exemplified in my 20 years as an attorney. I have litigated on behalf of elderly wards of the state of Florida. I have acted as a fiduciary of the state to prosecute cases where children have been the victims of abuse. I have worked in the poorest of our neighborhoods, drafting contracts between the city of Miami, developers and small business owners. Currently, I represent the fundamental legal interest in preserving families by litigating on behalf of parents and their children.
I believe that I now have sufficient experience to serve at a higher level. In addition, my children are now teenagers, and I am committed to dedicate the necessary time to this position. Our legal system is made up of the people that pass through our courts on a daily basis, on matters that greatly affect them individually. Each person's facts are impartially heard and decided. Not all cases make the papers, nor will most set legal precedent. The daily tasks may seem menial. However, it is this daily commitment, not grand gestures, that define our legal system. Every person has the right to have an impartial judge hear the facts of their case and apply the rule of law. This is what makes our legal system so great.
What about your experience qualifies you for the position?
I am currently a defense attorney for parents who have been accused of abuse, abandonment or neglect of their children. I have been shunned by those who once saw me as a hero for children, when I was a prosecutor with the Department of Children and Families. They believed I had changed as a person of moral character. This is especially true, because I zealously advocate for my clients' legal rights. What matters to me is that I provide my clients with the due process and legal representation required by law. However, the judges, case managers, attorneys and experts in the field came around to respecting my work and seeing the value it provides in reaching a just outcome. I have personally witnessed, as a dependency prosecutor for five years and a dependency defense attorney for seven years, that both sides need to be heard, so that justice can prevail. I believe this is an invaluable characteristic that I will have as a judge.
In addition, I have resided in Miami-Dade County since the first grade. I graduated from Hialeah High School, proceeded to Miami Dade Community College and went to law school at the University of Miami. I am married to a 21-year veteran district chief with the Hialeah Fire Department. We have created many ties in our community through our jobs, our children's school network and church organization.
What's your biggest achievement so far?
As proud as I am about my legal accomplishments and all the people I have helped, my greatest achievement to date is raising my two kind, beautiful children.
What would a successful term look like for you?
I would be prepared and versed in the law and facts of the cases that come before me. I would make myself available to hear cases and issue rulings in timely manner. My rulings would be impartial, free of any political or personal interests, based on the specific facts of each case and pursuant to the applicable law. My demeanor will portray respect, professionalism and impartiality on and off the bench.
What is the most important issue facing your county at the moment?
The most important challenge we are facing right now is how to continue to have a functioning judicial system under the parameters of the COVID-19 pandemic. Issues that greatly affect people's daily lives, such as family, financial and personal freedom, require the court's intervention. We have done a great job in maintaining the courts open via Zoom hearings. However, Zoom hearings are not adequate in some cases, especially highly contested evidentiary hearings and trials. The challenge continues to be balancing safety from the virus, with the safety of those in custody awaiting trial, parents who have not been able to visit with their children, and financial hardships on families perpetuated from the inability to have matters addressed in court.
More election coverage:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
3 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1State Court Denies Firm's Attempts to Arbitrate Late Attorney's $10M Life Insurance Dispute
- 2Remote Work and Cybersecurity: Keeping Law Firm Data Safe Beyond the Office
- 3Prisoners Get Education Support, How About Victims?
- 4Weil Grows Footprint in London
- 5The American Disabilities Act, Sovereign Immunity and Individual Liability
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250