'Carfax of Boating Industry' Seeks About $15M in Contract Dispute With Private Equity Company
Apax Partners terminated the contract between Boat Group and Boat History Report, according to court documents.
July 21, 2020 at 03:18 PM
3 minute read
There is a new twist in a multimillion-dollar contract dispute between a boating history report website, and a boating advertisement agency that was acquired by one of the largest private equity companies in the world.
The twist hinges on whether the advertising agency, Boats Group, committed fraud by failing to disclose to Boat History Report that it was in the process of being acquired by private equity company Apax Partners. Following that acquisition, Apax Partners terminated the contract between Boats Group and Boat History Report.
Now, after a brief lull in the case, an amended complaint seeking over $15 million in damages has been filed by Boat History Group in the Miami-Dade Circuit Court. This lawsuit is expected to place pressure on Apax Partners to move the parties' contract dispute to a resolution or to bring the case to trial.
Boat History Report has called itself the "Carfax of the boating industry." The watercraft history company has collected and provided information to watercraft buyers, such as the history of accidents and damages sustained.
Boats Group, which touted itself as "the world's largest recreational marine marketplace for boats and yachts," entered into a written contract with Boat History Report for a variety of services. Boat History Report had the exclusive right to perform the services under the contract, according to the court documents.
Boat History Report performed critical services for Boats Group, including keeping a library of documents required by various states for registering and titling a watercraft, and maintaining updates on changing state boating laws. In return, Boat History Report was to be paid significant dues each month and Boats Group, which has recently advertised that its sales and internet traffic has soared to significant highs, would provide an advertising campaign for Boating History Report.
However, the complaint alleged that Boats Group violated the contract, stating that it only paid a fraction of its dues and did not provide the advertising services that would have led to significant revenue for Boat History Report.
Gary Francis Baumann, a partner at Baumann, Gant & Keeley in Fort Lauderdale representing the defendants, did not respond to a request for comment.
|Read the amended complaint:
|Boat History Report alleged that the buyer of Boats Group, Apax Partners, was fully aware of the contract between the two companies. Despite that, after Apax Partners acquired Boats Group, it also acquired a competitor that provided a similar service to Boat History Report, known as YachtCloser. This acquisition allegedly violated the exclusivity provision in the contract with Boat History Report. Apax Partners then terminated the contract due to the conflict between Boat History Report and YachtCloser.
While A. Sheila Oretsky, a partner at Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney in Miami, who is representing Boat History Report, declined to comment, Grant Brooks, the CEO of Boat History Report alleged that Boats Group committed fraud by inducing his company to work for it.
Brooks alleged, "They could obtain our solution while knowing they were going to stop working once they acquired YachtCloser."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Slaps $16 Million Penalty on Defendants in Wyndham Timeshare Advertising Fraud Case
4 minute readGibson Dunn Recruits S&C Partner to Co-Lead M&A Practice, in 2-Partner Hire
Consumer Class Action Accuses Fabletics of Misleading Customers of 'VIP Membership Program' Value
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250