Miami Judge Faces Public Reprimand for Courthouse Disturbance with Visitors
The judge confronted several of the guests in the lobby and threatened to hold them in contempt for being loud.
July 27, 2020 at 11:14 AM
4 minute read
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge David C. Miller's reaction to a noisy group of guests in the courthouse could land him a public reprimand.
His discipline case revolves around Miami-Dade Circuit Judge William Altfield's Jan. 17 investiture, after which the Judicial Qualifications Commission claimed Miller inappropriately confronted guests who had gathered in the courthouse lobby.
Their chatting interrupted a tobacco trial Miller was presiding over, according to a report JQC Chair Krista Marx issued late Friday. The report said lawyers, judges and other witnesses saw Miller "yelling and waving his arms at the people in the lobby while trying to get them be quiet."
Miller allegedly confronted a guest who shook her head at him, remarking, "Do not shake your head at me," then threatening to hold her in contempt and demanding to know who she was. That guest is an assistant general counsel to the Miami-Dade Circuit, according to Marx's report, which said the incident lasted about two minutes.
Marx's report said that, before leaving his courtroom, Miller first sent his bailiff to address the problem, following complaints from plaintiffs and defense lawyers who said they were "yelling" at witnesses. When that didn't work, the judge reportedly sent the court clerk and the bailiff to the lobby—but to no avail.
That's when Miller took matters into his own hands, according to the report, which relied on courtroom video footage and said the noise he created ironically interrupted another judge's tobacco trial. When the shouting and arm waving didn't work, Miller then reportedly went from group to group explaining that he was conducting a trial.
Marx wrote that Miller's conduct, "including his inappropriate threat of contempt, plainly fell below the high standard of conduct required by the canons and this court." The report said the episode resulted in three ethical violations governing the integrity and independence of the judiciary, promoting public confidence, and being patient and courteous.
Miller has admitted violating the canons and conceded his conduct was inappropriate, according to a stipulation he signed.
The judge represented himself in the discipline proceedings, according to online case files. Miller declined to comment.
As for the employee who shook her head, Miller claimed he'd taken that as an indication that she wouldn't comply but in hindsight conceded it could have been in disbelief.
"The commission is particularly disturbed by Judge Miller's repeated threat to hold one of the people in the lobby in contempt for shaking her head in disbelief over Judge Miller's behavior," Marx's report said. "Judge Miller had other options available for dealing with the disruption to his trial, such as taking a recess or calling court administration to ask for assistance. The method he ultimately chose to employ reflected poorly on himself, and the judiciary as a whole."
Marx recommended a reprimand for Miller, pointing to cases that ended with reprimands for similar behavior, including one for a judge who threatened a police officer with contempt when noise from their radio interrupted his lunch.
This is Miller's first discipline case in more than 20 years on the bench and 20 years as an attorney, according to the report, which also noted that he's agreed to avoid contact with the employee he threatened with contempt and to "avoid attending investitures where that individual might be present."
The Florida Supreme Court can choose to accept or reject the JQC's recommendation.
Read the report:
Read more:
Congratulate This Miami Judge on His New Position
Miami Judge Facing Ethics Charges Over TV Show Claims JQC Violated First Amendment
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1FTX One Year Later: The Impact on Examiner Practice in Bankruptcy Courts
- 2Gen AI Legal Contract Startup Ivo Announces $16 Million Series A Funding Round
- 3DOJ's Flawed Thinking in Challenging HPE-Juniper Merger
- 4Annual Self-Check: Testing For Bias On The Bench
- 5'None of Us Like It': How Expedited Summer Associate Recruiting Affects Law Students and the Firms Hiring Them
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250