This Powerful Home Construction Company Faces Allegations of Shoddy Construction
Litigation alleging Lennar did not construct homes that comply with state building codes has embattled the Miami-based company for decades.
July 30, 2020 at 02:58 PM
3 minute read
One of the most powerful home construction companies in the nation is facing allegations of shoddy construction at one of its South Florida communities. And attorneys for the community said these defects posed a danger to residents.
The homeowners' association at Martinique at the Oasis, which is a Lennar Homes community in Homestead, filed the lawsuit in the Miami-Dade Circuit Court. The lawsuit alleged Lennar did not construct the homes under all applicable building codes and ignored the association's demands to make necessary repairs.
Lawsuits against Lennar are nothing new, as the construction company has faced litigation over the last several decades. Most notably, Lennar was named as a defendant in multiple actions when Hurricane Andrew leveled thousands of South Florida homes in 1992, including many homes Lennar built in the 1980s.
Building defects, such as nails that went through plywood without hitting trusses, violated the then-existing Miami-Dade Building Code. As a result, builders, including Lennar, were hit with a storm of litigation in the courtroom. Due to the damage suffered in Hurricane Andrew, state and local officials significantly strengthened building codes to improve the safety of the South Florida population that is particularly vulnerable to hurricane damage.
Now, Roger Brown, a partner at Morgan & Morgan's West Palm Beach office who represents the association, said a Miami-Dade Circuit Court judge would have to decide if Lennar "shirked" its responsibility to fix the issues presented by the association.
Martinique has 26 townhouse-style buildings, which are subdivided into 241 individual units. In 2018, the association became aware of construction defects in the "exterior wall cladding system" when there was discoloration in the paint.
In the complaint, the association argued that Lennar was required to "perform, coordinate and supervise the construction" to make sure it aligned with the plans and state and local building codes, as well as to maintain, repair, and make replacements requested by the association.
Read the complaint:
The association hired GCI Consultants to investigate the issues. Through its investigation, GCI determined that defects caused water intrusion in the stucco, stone cladding and foam moldings on the outside of the building.
Lennar said the association's 558 Notice describing defective conditions in detail was dismissed as too "vague" to address. The association stated in response in its complaint that since Lennar did not bother to request an inspection of the defects, further investigation by GCI provided more detail in a supplemental notice of claims document. Lennar Corp. did not respond to a request for comment.
Stuart Miller, Lennar's CEO, announced strong earnings and signaled strong demand for new single-family homes due to the current housing shortage, in a recent second quarter earnings call.
Brown hopes that if these types of defects at Martinique become apparent in other communities, the association's lawsuit will empower other homeowner associations to investigate the defects, so Lennar "does not cut corners" on future building projects.
READ MORE:
3rd DCA Remands Case From Woman Suing Lennar Over Alleged Hidden Danger in Model Home
Doral Community Charges Lennar With Condo Construction Defects
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Issues in Florida Construction Law That Attorneys Need to Be Aware Of
6 minute readMediating Community Association Disputes: Tips for Attorneys, and Their Clients
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250