This Powerful Home Construction Company Faces Allegations of Shoddy Construction
Litigation alleging Lennar did not construct homes that comply with state building codes has embattled the Miami-based company for decades.
July 30, 2020 at 02:58 PM
3 minute read
One of the most powerful home construction companies in the nation is facing allegations of shoddy construction at one of its South Florida communities. And attorneys for the community said these defects posed a danger to residents.
The homeowners' association at Martinique at the Oasis, which is a Lennar Homes community in Homestead, filed the lawsuit in the Miami-Dade Circuit Court. The lawsuit alleged Lennar did not construct the homes under all applicable building codes and ignored the association's demands to make necessary repairs.
Lawsuits against Lennar are nothing new, as the construction company has faced litigation over the last several decades. Most notably, Lennar was named as a defendant in multiple actions when Hurricane Andrew leveled thousands of South Florida homes in 1992, including many homes Lennar built in the 1980s.
Building defects, such as nails that went through plywood without hitting trusses, violated the then-existing Miami-Dade Building Code. As a result, builders, including Lennar, were hit with a storm of litigation in the courtroom. Due to the damage suffered in Hurricane Andrew, state and local officials significantly strengthened building codes to improve the safety of the South Florida population that is particularly vulnerable to hurricane damage.
Now, Roger Brown, a partner at Morgan & Morgan's West Palm Beach office who represents the association, said a Miami-Dade Circuit Court judge would have to decide if Lennar "shirked" its responsibility to fix the issues presented by the association.
Martinique has 26 townhouse-style buildings, which are subdivided into 241 individual units. In 2018, the association became aware of construction defects in the "exterior wall cladding system" when there was discoloration in the paint.
In the complaint, the association argued that Lennar was required to "perform, coordinate and supervise the construction" to make sure it aligned with the plans and state and local building codes, as well as to maintain, repair, and make replacements requested by the association.
|Read the complaint:
|The association hired GCI Consultants to investigate the issues. Through its investigation, GCI determined that defects caused water intrusion in the stucco, stone cladding and foam moldings on the outside of the building.
Lennar said the association's 558 Notice describing defective conditions in detail was dismissed as too "vague" to address. The association stated in response in its complaint that since Lennar did not bother to request an inspection of the defects, further investigation by GCI provided more detail in a supplemental notice of claims document. Lennar Corp. did not respond to a request for comment.
Stuart Miller, Lennar's CEO, announced strong earnings and signaled strong demand for new single-family homes due to the current housing shortage, in a recent second quarter earnings call.
Brown hopes that if these types of defects at Martinique become apparent in other communities, the association's lawsuit will empower other homeowner associations to investigate the defects, so Lennar "does not cut corners" on future building projects.
|READ MORE:
3rd DCA Remands Case From Woman Suing Lennar Over Alleged Hidden Danger in Model Home
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMediating Community Association Disputes: Tips for Attorneys, and Their Clients
6 minute readCole, Scott & Kissane Keeps Transitioning More Resources Into Construction As Tort Reform Changes Loom
4 minute readCheap Lumber, Stronger Hurricanes—Perfect Storm for the Strained Florida Insurance Market
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1First California Zantac Jury Ends in Mistrial
- 2Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 3Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 4Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 5Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250