![The appeal involved a Hollywood lawyer who received nearly 2,000 pre-recorded calls over student loans. Photo: Shutterstock.com.](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/392/2020/12/shutterstock_314164784-2-Article-202012070858.jpg)
South Florida Attorney Thwarted by 'Fine Print' in Nuisance Call Suit
The attorney claimed he was tricked into consenting to receive telephone calls, but the appellate panel saw things differently.
December 07, 2020 at 02:11 PM
4 minute read
A South Florida debt defense attorney who sued over nuisance calls has lost out at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, thanks to a pesky contract clause.
It's a case that demonstrates the boundaries of consumer protection law because although the attorney told an operator he didn't want automated calls, the appellate panel found Friday that he had inadvertently reconsented moments later through an online form.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Heir Cut: Florida Appellate Court Backs Garth Reeves' Will Heir Cut: Florida Appellate Court Backs Garth Reeves' Will](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/1a/5a/54f1609943889700618e7b8cd244/shaw-wilder-robinson-767x633.jpg)
![Holland & Knight Expands Corporate Practice in Texas With Former Greenberg Traurig Partner Holland & Knight Expands Corporate Practice in Texas With Former Greenberg Traurig Partner](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/cd/e5/cb5a9afd423bb775415c5ba8a0e4/ronald-skloss-767x633.jpg)
Holland & Knight Expands Corporate Practice in Texas With Former Greenberg Traurig Partner
3 minute read![Forum Clause Axes $844M Case Against Reinsurer Over Deadly Plane Crash, Judge Rules Forum Clause Axes $844M Case Against Reinsurer Over Deadly Plane Crash, Judge Rules](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/dailybusinessreview/contrib/content/uploads/sites/414/2024/08/International-View.jpeg-image767x633cropped.jpg)
Forum Clause Axes $844M Case Against Reinsurer Over Deadly Plane Crash, Judge Rules
![Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/da/ba/c9c8183f455ca4d0722b50d88bcb/tampa-skyline-767x633.jpg)
Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Librarian's Termination Violated First Amendment Protections, Lawsuit Claims
- 2Choice-of-Law Issues as the UCC 2022 Amendments Come into Effect
- 3Six Benefits of Taking an Opposing Medical Expert’s Deposition
- 4Ex-Prosecutor’s Trial Ends as Judge Throws Out Her Felony Indictment in Ahmaud Arbery Death Case
- 5Conversation Catalyst: Transforming Professional Advancement Through Strategic Dialogue
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250