Miami Jungle Island Hotel Progresses Despite Sea Level Concerns, Resident Opposition
The developer that leases Jungle Island from the city wants to build a 281-key hotel in a 110-foot tall building, although it can go up to 130 feet and 300 keys.
December 17, 2020 at 04:43 PM
4 minute read
A voter-approved plan for a hotel at publicly owned Jungle Island on Miami's Watson Island is progressing, but not everyone is a fan. Members of a Miami planning board raised questions over the project's long-term viability in light of sea level rise and storm surge, which pose threats as Watson Island is surrounded on three sides by Biscayne Bay. Also, residents of a Miami condominium less than 1,000 feet north across the bay from the development site raised concerns over disruptive noise and light from the project. They asked for a one-month delay to give them time to review plans, but were unsuccessful. The Miami Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board on Wednesday green-lighted the proposal, moving it on for final consideration by the City Commission. The city owns the 18.6-acre site on the northeast corner of Watson Island that now is home to eco-themed entertainment complex Jungle Island. It leases the site to an affiliate of Aventura-based real estate investor ESJ Capital Partners, which runs Jungle Island. Miami voters in 2018 approved a referendum for the city to extend ESJ Capital Partners' lease up to 99 years and allow a hotel up to 130 feet tall. ESJ Capital says it wants to develop a 281-key, seven-story hotel on top of a four-story garage, in which case the building would be 110 feet. It would be within its rights to add another hotel story with 19 rooms, for a 130-foot tall building. The development would be made to merge with the entertainment complex Jungle Island, which will remain, and will include an elevated porte-cochère leading into the lobby of the hotel, as well as an elevated park reminiscent of The High Line in New York. Planning board member Paul Mann pointed out that Watson is a dredged island, and Miami has declared a climate change emergency, yet this is a waterfront project exposed to sea level rise. "This is a pretty big gamble. I am just curious how that works out," Mann said. "Will it be economically viable?" Miami planner Ryan Shedd, who deemed that the proposal meets city regulation and recommended approval, responded that part of the site isn't in a city-designated high-hazard area. Regardless, the development would be required to meet city and federal regulations that address storms and sea level rise, he added. ESJ attorney T. Spencer Crowley III, an Akerman partner in Miami, pushed back against the request by 1000 Venetian Way condominium residents to defer a decision. The plans were made public in the referendum two years ago, and ESJ Capital is under a deadline of early 2023 to obtain its first building permit, Crowley said. He said the developer held a presentation to the condo on Monday and vowed for more outreach. 1000 Venetian is on Biscayne Island along the Venetian Causeway, located north of Watson Island that runs along the MacArthur Causeway. 1000 Venetian's attorney, Dubbin & Kravetz's Sam Dubbin in Coral Gables, conceded general plans were made public in 2018 but said a 1,000-page, detailed application wasn't made available until a week ago. "One week is simply not enough time for the residents who are going to be most seriously impacted to do the analysis necessary," Dubbin said. "For me as a lawyer, even, to read 1,000 pages like that could take over a week." Mann and planning board member Anthony Parrish were the only no votes Wednesday. If the commission approves the project, ESJ is to pay the city a $1.2 million annual base rent as well as 5% of gross hotel revenue once the hotel opens. The base rent would be $250,000 annually during construction. Jungle Island, at 1111 Jungle Trail, would be the latest Watson Island property to be developed. On the southwest side of the island, Flagstone Island Gardens LLC is building a 305-room hotel with 105 timeshares; a 300-room hotel; and 221,000 square feet of retail. Read more: Miami's Watson Island Flagstone Project Wins on Appeal
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All830 Brickell is Open After Two-Year Delay That Led to Winston & Strawn Pulling Lease
3 minute readMiami Lawyers Beat Other Local Sectors, Attorneys Elsewhere in Office Usage
3 minute read'Would've Been Snoring Without Ya': Fort Lauderdale Jury Awards $4.5 Million in Condo Investment Spat
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250