Fla. Supreme Court Rejects Claim for Damages Caused by Insurer's Failure to Timely Pay
The Florida Supreme Court relieved an insurance company from damages allegedly caused by its failure to timely investigate and pay a legitimate insurance claim.
January 28, 2021 at 11:15 AM
6 minute read
The Florida Supreme Court relieved an insurance company from damages allegedly caused by its failure to timely investigate and pay a legitimate insurance claim. The property owner was not entitled to recover lost rent from its insurance carrier when the owner needed the insurance money to repair the building and the insurance carrier failed to pay the claim for more than five years.
As discussed in Citizens Property Insurance v. Manor House, Case No. SC19-1394 (January 21, 2021), Manor House obtained property insurance through Citizens—a governmental entity—for nine apartment buildings. The apartment buildings incurred significant damage from Hurricane Frances in September 2004. Following an inspection, Citizens issued payments totaling $1,927,747. Manor House requested that Citizens reopen the claim and sought damages exceeding $10,000,000. In 2006, Citizens re-adjusted the claim and informally estimated the "replacement cost value" of the loss at $6,410,456. In August 2007, Manor House filed suit demanding payment of the undisputed claim amount and requested an appraisal of the remaining portion of its claim. The trial court ordered the parties to participate in an appraisal process and, in 2009, Manor House was awarded more than $8,000,000. In January 2010—more than five years after the damage and initial insurance claim—Citizens paid Manor House an additional $5,502,022 to complete payment on the property damage claim.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDon’t Forget the Owner’s Manual: A Guide to Proving Liability Through Manufacturers’ Warnings and Instructions
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 2E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 3The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 4FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
- 5Chief Judge Joins Panel Exploring Causes for Public's Eroding Faith in NY Legal System
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250