The Hennepin County District Court trial involving Derek Chauvin, a former Minnesota police officer, concluded closing arguments Monday. Now, the jurors in the case are debating whether Chauvin is guilty of second and third-degree murder, and second-degree manslaughter in the death of George Floyd, 46. And according to South Florida litigators, the main factor influencing the jury's decision-making process will be how compelling the closing arguments were from the opposing counsel. Click through the slideshow for some of their strategies and reflections on their closing arguments that — mostly — helped them prevail in their trial cases.