The Florida Supreme Court has a divided opinion about what constitutes a property that has “escaped taxation,” based on a six-panel decision that upheld a ruling from the Second District Court of Appeal.

It’s a ruling that emphasizes that a property has only escaped taxation when it’s not taxed, as opposed to when it is under-taxed due to an accidental under-valuation. But it came with two written dissents. 

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]