Florida, Federal Gov't Could Battle Over School Mask Penalties
Florida Education Commissioner Richard Corcoran received authorization from the State Board of Education to sue the U.S. Department of Education for intervening in the state's punishment of school districts.
November 17, 2021 at 01:51 PM
5 minute read
Top Florida education officials inched closer to a legal battle with the Biden administration over federal reimbursements for school districts that were dinged financially by the state for imposing student mask mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Florida Education Commissioner Richard Corcoran received authorization from the State Board of Education to sue the U.S. Department of Education for intervening in the state's punishment of school districts. Tuesday's decision by the state board was the latest development in a feud with the federal government that has been brewing since the beginning of the school year.
On Aug. 17, the State Board of Education voted to withhold money from the school districts in Alachua and Broward counties for maintaining student mask requirements despite a Florida Department of Health emergency rule that sought to prevent such mandates. The penalties were designed to block funding in amounts equal to the monthly salaries of school board members.
The U.S. Department of Education, however, began to offset the state's penalties by launching a grant program dubbed Project SAFE, or Project to Support America's Families and Educators. As of this week, nearly $721,000 in federal funding has been awarded to the Alachua and Broward school districts.
"These are, to date, the only two school districts in the nation that have received SAFE grants," said Anastasios Kamoutsas, general counsel for the Florida Department of Education.
On Oct. 7, the state education board authorized financial penalties against six other school districts and approved a plan to try to thwart the Biden administration's grant funding. That plan involved withholding additional amounts of money from districts equal to the federal funding.
The move prompted the federal education department to file a cease-and-desist complaint in its Division of Administrative Law Judges.
"We believe Florida's actions have violated federal law by reducing state funds based on the receipt by districts of federal funds," the federal department said in a statement accompanying its Oct. 28 complaint.
But Corcoran asked the state board Tuesday for a green light to "vigorously defend (against) the cease and desist complaint filed by the U.S. DOE" and to "protect our sovereignty" against what he called an "unlawful" federal grant program.
"The aim of this board's enforcement is simply to encourage school districts to comply with the law, a value we all want our children to hold," Corcoran told the board. "Now, as you're aware, during the enforcement process, the Biden administration made its best efforts to both politicize these issues and undermine the legal authority of this board, and indeed the sovereignty of the state of Florida."
The state education department has hired attorney Steven Engel to represent it in the U.S. Department of Education complaint, "and, if necessary, in related litigation," Kamoutsas said Tuesday.
In defending the state board's actions, Corcoran touted a Nov. 5 decision by a state administrative law judge that upheld the Department of Health's emergency rule, which said parents can opt students out of school mask requirements. Administrative Law Judge Brian Newman wrote in his decision that attorneys for six school boards challenging the rule "failed to prove that the emergency rule opt-out provisions facilitate the spread of COVID-19 in schools."
Following Newman's decision, school districts that had continued to require students to wear masks dropped the mandates.
With all school districts now in compliance with the health department's rule, attorneys for the state education department said it intends to release money previously withheld from districts for failing to comply with the board's mask directive.
Engel told the board that the districts' reversal on the mask mandates could upend the U.S. Department of Education complaint before a federal administrative law judge.
"Currently, the [administrative law judge] has set a hearing for Dec. 10. But in light of the Alachua school district's recent compliance, and the Broward school district's anticipated compliance, the previously withheld aid … is expected to be dispersed. And therefore, the parties requested that the administrative law judge defer issuing a briefing schedule. And we expect that the hearing date will be pushed back if that case goes forward at all," Engel said.
Shortly before the state board adjourned Tuesday, Corcoran issued a warning to districts that might consider reimposing mask mandates.
"It's my hope that districts will continue to comply with Florida's laws, including the Department of Health's emergency rule. But should that change, we must vigorously defend the state's authority to control its educational system," Corcoran said.
A spokesman for the U.S. Department of Education didn't immediately respond Tuesday to questions from The News Service of Florida about the status of the department's cease-and-desist complaint.
Ryan Dailey reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCOVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Attorneys Battle PPP Loan-Forgiveness Woes for Hotel Clients
Returning to Court in a Post-COVID Era: The Pros and Cons of a Virtual Court System
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250