Florida Lawmakers Pass Plan to Block Vaccine Mandates
Gov. Ron DeSantis has sparred for months with the White House about COVID-19 policies.
November 18, 2021 at 12:36 PM
6 minute read
Rebuking the Biden administration, Florida's Republican-controlled Legislature passed a measure that seeks to prevent workers from being required to get vaccinated against COVID-19.
The votes by the House and Senate came on the third day of a special legislative session called by Gov. Ron DeSantis, who has sparred for months with the White House about COVID-19 policies. But the outcome of the votes was never in doubt: Republican leaders agreed on the bill (HB 1B) before the session started and walled it off from any changes.
"We trust the individual Floridians to make the best decision for themselves and their children, more than we trust the federal government," Rep. Joe Harding, R-Williston, said before the House voted 78-39 along almost straight party lines to pass the bill.
Democrats criticized the bill, and the decision to hold a special session, as a political ploy by Republicans and said it will not help curb the COVID-19 pandemic.
"We have been here all week debating this in a way that is only prolonging this pandemic and making it harder for us to get shots in arms and dollars in people's pockets, so that we can get on with our lives," Rep. Andrew Learned, D-Brandon, said.
Several hours after the House passed the bill Wednesday, the Senate voted 24-14 along party lines to give final approval.
The special session was driven, at least in part, by Biden administration moves aimed at requiring workers at large businesses, federal contractors and in the health-care industry to be vaccinated.
Under the bill, Florida private-sector workers could avoid vaccination requirements if they provide medical reasons, religious reasons or can demonstrate "COVID-19 immunity." Also, they could be exempt if they agree to regular COVID-19 testing or agree to wear personal protective equipment.
Employers could face fines up to $50,000 per violation if they don't properly follow the law.
The legislation also will bar government agencies from requiring workers to be vaccinated. In addition, it reinforces a law known as the "Parents' Bill of Rights" to ban student mask and vaccination requirements in public schools.
The school part of the bill came after months of legal battling between the state and some school districts that required students to wear masks. Those districts have dropped mask requirements recently as COVID-19 cases have subsided, and districts have not imposed vaccination mandates.
Rep. Geraldine Thompson, D-Windermere, argued that blocking schools from being able to mandate such COVID-19 mitigation measures would aggravate a teacher shortage in the state.
"Are we putting teachers at risk? And I am concerned that we have a teacher shortage. We have people taking early retirement. We have shortages in terms of people who will not drive our school buses because they are in that enclosed environment with young people who don't have to wear masks, who don't have to be vaccinated," Thompson said.
But Rep. Mike Caruso, R-Delray Beach, defended the prohibition on school mask requirements.
"I sit there and I question our school boards for mandating masks for our children," Caruso said. "They say 'Well, physically, it's going to protect them from the (virus),' when they fail to recognize the mental health issues that masks cause."
The only Democrat who voted for the bill was Rep. James Bush, D-Miami, and the measure sparked a sometimes-raw partisan fight.
At one point, Rep. Anthony Sabatini, R-Howey-in-the-Hills, called President Joe Biden a "tyrant" and urged "nullifying" federal laws, drawing jeers from Democrats. Rep. Bryan Avila, a Miami Springs Republican who was presiding over the House at the time, directed House members not to make comments about Biden or DeSantis.
During a news conference later, House Democrats said the session was more about the political ambitions of DeSantis, who is widely considered a potential 2024 presidential candidate, than about addressing the more than 60,000 Florida deaths from COVID-19.
"The circus has folded up its tents and is going back home," House Minority Co-leader Evan Jenne, D-Dania Beach, said. "The special session on promoting a presidential campaign is over. But the damage to public health will last for a generation and lead to untold death and suffering."
Florida, other states and businesses have filed federal-court challenges to an Occupational Safety and Health Administration rule aimed at requiring tens of millions of workers to be vaccinated against COVID-19 or be regularly tested and wear masks. The rule has been put on hold after an order by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which hears cases from Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas. The order did not resolve the underlying legal issues in the challenges.
"While OSHA remains confident in its authority to protect workers in emergencies, OSHA has suspended activities related to the implementation and enforcement of the (rule) pending future developments in the litigation," the agency's website said Wednesday.
Separate federal rules are designed to require vaccination of employees of federal contractors and employees of hospitals, nursing homes and other health-care providers that take part in the Medicaid and Medicare programs. Florida also has filed a legal challenge against the federal-contractor rule.
Republicans said Wednesday that Floridians will lose jobs because of the federal directives. They said people should be free to make decisions about whether to get vaccinated.
"It's just mind-blowing most days to think that it is an acceptable position to hold that another person would get to make the health care decision of whether or not to be vaccinated, that an employer would be able to make a health care decision for their employee," House bill co-sponsor Erin Grall, R-Vero Beach, said.
Senate sponsor Danny Burgess, R-Zephyrhills, said the bill will "help Florida return to normal."
"No one should lose a job because of a vaccine mandate," Burgess said.
But Rep. Omari Hardy, D-West Palm Beach, disputed the Republicans' arguments.
"You want to put cancer patients at risk, you want to put people with diabetes at risk, you want to put young babies who are not yet able to get vaccinated at risk, you want to put all number of people at risk because you don't want to get a shot. I know 5-year-olds braver than that," Hardy said. "This isn't about freedom. It's about responsibility."
Jim Saunders and Tom Urban report for the News Service of Florida. News Service staff writers Ryan Dailey and Jim Turner contributed to this report.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCOVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Attorneys Battle PPP Loan-Forgiveness Woes for Hotel Clients
Returning to Court in a Post-COVID Era: The Pros and Cons of a Virtual Court System
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Varsity Brands Lures Aboard Keurig Dr. Pepper Legal Chief
- 2Federal Judge Warns of 'Serious Sanctions' on FDIC Over Document Retention
- 3Meet the Former NFL Player Now Back at Vinson & Elkins
- 4Inside Track: Cooley's Modest Proposal to Make Executives Safer
- 5Justified Termination Does Not Bar Associate Attorney From Unemployment Benefits, State Appellate Court Rules
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.