In the law, systems for early resolution are helpful. One such system is the voluntary binding medical malpractice arbitration process. This process comes about by election of the parties—it is voluntary. It is a product of statutes enacted in 1988 and it was revitalized in 2019 when it withstood constitutional challenge for the third time. The mechanics of the statute are such that when one party submits to this process before a lawsuit is filed, then caps on damages are limited, whether or not the other side agrees to arbitration. Caps on damages, once they arise, translate into a more predictable outcome than when there are no caps. When there are no caps, general damages potentials cannot be estimated in advance without a great deal of speculation. Once damages are capped, there is less speculation and a great deal more certainty about case value. In many instances, this certainty leads to earlier resolution of medical malpractice cases.