Opponents of Casino Gambling Initiative Fire Back in Lawsuit
Leon County Circuit Judge Angela Dempsey ordered political committee Florida Voters in Charge to quickly provide the names of workers who had been targeted to stop gathering signatures for a proposed constitutional amendment that would open the door for casinos in North Florida.
December 20, 2021 at 01:35 PM
5 minute read
Legal wrangling escalated about signature gathering for a proposed constitutional amendment that would open the door for casinos in North Florida, with lawyers for entities linked to the Seminole Tribe accusing backers of the ballot initiative of breaking the law.
Florida Voters in Charge, a political committee behind the casino proposal, is racing to meet a Feb. 1 deadline to submit nearly 900,000 signatures to state elections officials to make it onto the 2022 ballot.
The committee, financed largely by casino behemoth Las Vegas Sands Corp., filed a lawsuit Dec. 1 alleging that businesses, individuals and a committee tied to the Seminoles are trying to "sabotage" the petition drive, in part by paying people to stop gathering signatures.
Leon County Circuit Judge Angela Dempsey on Dec. 10 refused to dismiss the lawsuit, which accuses the defendants of "tortious interference." But Dempsey ordered the plaintiffs to quickly provide the names of workers who had been targeted and contracts.
The following day, the plaintiffs withdrew a petition for an emergency injunction, though the underlying lawsuit remained pending.
On Friday, lawyers for the defendants filed a motion seeking to enforce Dempsey's order on turning over information and alleging that some of the plaintiffs had violated state elections laws in the petition drive.
"Plaintiffs are brazenly violating Florida election law. This raises serious integrity questions. As it pertains to the instant case, while the plaintiffs have accused defendants of hiring plaintiffs' employees, the underlying employee contracts at issue are based on an illegal scheme, so the contracts themselves are illegal and therefore … unenforceable," West Palm Beach attorney William Shepherd, who represents the defendants, wrote.
The motion said that contracts provided to the defendants were heavily redacted, but the plaintiffs "offered no explanations for the redactions." It accused backers of the ballot initiative of intentionally trying to hide the information.
"Upon closer analysis, including review of one of the plaintiffs' own websites, it appears these redactions were done to hide the illegal compensation scheme for how the plaintiffs pay their circulators," the motion said.
The motion pointed to the website of Grassfire LLC, one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit. The website showed that workers would be paid $25 per hour plus bonuses of up to $2,000, depending on the number of signatures they collected in a week. Florida law makes it illegal to pay petition gatherers by the signature for ballot initiatives.
But Jim McKee, a Tallahassee attorney who represents the plaintiffs, disputed the accusations.
The defendants' "allegations are meritless, and are nothing more than an attempt to divert attention from their aggressive attempts to prevent Florida voters from having the opportunity to vote to end the Seminole Tribe's monopoly over Florida casino gaming," McKee said in a statement.
Friday's motion also included an affidavit by Steven Larry Laws, a Pinellas County resident who worked on the ballot initiative with Grassfire this year.
Laws accused Grassfire owner Lee Vasche of paying a "bonus" to petition gatherers to sidestep the law banning them from being paid by the signature. Laws also alleged that Vasche instructed workers to destroy petitions that could be rejected or to fill in missing information on petition forms, in violation of state law.
Laws' affidavit said he stopped working with Vasche in October "based on several grievances I had with Lee's operation including violations of Florida law."
But a federal lawsuit filed by Grassfire in November alleged that Laws was offered $1 million by "an organization opposed" to the casino gambling proposal to stop working on the ballot initiative "and to sabotage Grassfire's campaign." Laws allegedly rejected the initial offer but "negotiated and accepted" a subsequent offer in October, the legal complaint alleged.
The lawsuit accused Laws of "hiring away circulators," "spreading lies to circulators and others about Grassfire," "ruining Grassfire's relationships with individuals that own property on which Grassfire is allowed to solicit signatures" and working on "a dummy petition" backed by the Seminoles.
In his statement Friday, McKee highlighted Laws' testimony.
"It is no surprise that one of the individuals relied upon as support for the allegations is Larry Laws. Mr. Laws is currently the subject of a federal court lawsuit alleging he received a substantial amount of money, believed to be in excess of $1 million, in exchange for his agreement to attempt to sabotage efforts to place the casino gaming amendment on the ballot," McKee said.
The motion filed by the defendants Friday also alleged that whistleblowers working for the petition initiative claimed circulators' hours were cut to match the number of petitions they had gathered, meaning they were being paid per signature in violation of the state law.
The defendants also alleged that whistleblowers said supporters of the ballot initiative were using unregistered signature gatherers "to illegally boost their workforce."
Defendants in the lawsuit include Marc Jacoby; Kara Owens; Cornerstone Solutions Florida LLC; Let the Voters Decide, LLC; and Standing Up for Florida, Inc., a political committee backed by the Seminoles.
As of late Friday afternoon, the state Division of Elections had received 287,101 valid petition signatures for the casino initiative. Florida Voters in Charge needs to submit 891,589 by the Feb. 1 deadline.
Dara Kam reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1With AI Expected to Be a Focus This Year, What Changes Can Midsize Firms Expect?
- 2Dissenter Blasts 4th Circuit Majority Decision Upholding Meta's Section 230 Defense
- 3NBA Players Association Finds Its New GC in Warriors Front Office
- 4Prenuptial Agreement Spousal Support Waivers: Proceed With Caution
- 5DC Circuit Keeps Docs in Judge Newman's Misconduct Proceedings Sealed
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250