Opponents of Casino Gambling Initiative Fire Back in Lawsuit
Leon County Circuit Judge Angela Dempsey ordered political committee Florida Voters in Charge to quickly provide the names of workers who had been targeted to stop gathering signatures for a proposed constitutional amendment that would open the door for casinos in North Florida.
December 20, 2021 at 01:35 PM
5 minute read
Legal wrangling escalated about signature gathering for a proposed constitutional amendment that would open the door for casinos in North Florida, with lawyers for entities linked to the Seminole Tribe accusing backers of the ballot initiative of breaking the law.
Florida Voters in Charge, a political committee behind the casino proposal, is racing to meet a Feb. 1 deadline to submit nearly 900,000 signatures to state elections officials to make it onto the 2022 ballot.
The committee, financed largely by casino behemoth Las Vegas Sands Corp., filed a lawsuit Dec. 1 alleging that businesses, individuals and a committee tied to the Seminoles are trying to "sabotage" the petition drive, in part by paying people to stop gathering signatures.
Leon County Circuit Judge Angela Dempsey on Dec. 10 refused to dismiss the lawsuit, which accuses the defendants of "tortious interference." But Dempsey ordered the plaintiffs to quickly provide the names of workers who had been targeted and contracts.
The following day, the plaintiffs withdrew a petition for an emergency injunction, though the underlying lawsuit remained pending.
On Friday, lawyers for the defendants filed a motion seeking to enforce Dempsey's order on turning over information and alleging that some of the plaintiffs had violated state elections laws in the petition drive.
"Plaintiffs are brazenly violating Florida election law. This raises serious integrity questions. As it pertains to the instant case, while the plaintiffs have accused defendants of hiring plaintiffs' employees, the underlying employee contracts at issue are based on an illegal scheme, so the contracts themselves are illegal and therefore … unenforceable," West Palm Beach attorney William Shepherd, who represents the defendants, wrote.
The motion said that contracts provided to the defendants were heavily redacted, but the plaintiffs "offered no explanations for the redactions." It accused backers of the ballot initiative of intentionally trying to hide the information.
"Upon closer analysis, including review of one of the plaintiffs' own websites, it appears these redactions were done to hide the illegal compensation scheme for how the plaintiffs pay their circulators," the motion said.
The motion pointed to the website of Grassfire LLC, one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit. The website showed that workers would be paid $25 per hour plus bonuses of up to $2,000, depending on the number of signatures they collected in a week. Florida law makes it illegal to pay petition gatherers by the signature for ballot initiatives.
But Jim McKee, a Tallahassee attorney who represents the plaintiffs, disputed the accusations.
The defendants' "allegations are meritless, and are nothing more than an attempt to divert attention from their aggressive attempts to prevent Florida voters from having the opportunity to vote to end the Seminole Tribe's monopoly over Florida casino gaming," McKee said in a statement.
Friday's motion also included an affidavit by Steven Larry Laws, a Pinellas County resident who worked on the ballot initiative with Grassfire this year.
Laws accused Grassfire owner Lee Vasche of paying a "bonus" to petition gatherers to sidestep the law banning them from being paid by the signature. Laws also alleged that Vasche instructed workers to destroy petitions that could be rejected or to fill in missing information on petition forms, in violation of state law.
Laws' affidavit said he stopped working with Vasche in October "based on several grievances I had with Lee's operation including violations of Florida law."
But a federal lawsuit filed by Grassfire in November alleged that Laws was offered $1 million by "an organization opposed" to the casino gambling proposal to stop working on the ballot initiative "and to sabotage Grassfire's campaign." Laws allegedly rejected the initial offer but "negotiated and accepted" a subsequent offer in October, the legal complaint alleged.
The lawsuit accused Laws of "hiring away circulators," "spreading lies to circulators and others about Grassfire," "ruining Grassfire's relationships with individuals that own property on which Grassfire is allowed to solicit signatures" and working on "a dummy petition" backed by the Seminoles.
In his statement Friday, McKee highlighted Laws' testimony.
"It is no surprise that one of the individuals relied upon as support for the allegations is Larry Laws. Mr. Laws is currently the subject of a federal court lawsuit alleging he received a substantial amount of money, believed to be in excess of $1 million, in exchange for his agreement to attempt to sabotage efforts to place the casino gaming amendment on the ballot," McKee said.
The motion filed by the defendants Friday also alleged that whistleblowers working for the petition initiative claimed circulators' hours were cut to match the number of petitions they had gathered, meaning they were being paid per signature in violation of the state law.
The defendants also alleged that whistleblowers said supporters of the ballot initiative were using unregistered signature gatherers "to illegally boost their workforce."
Defendants in the lawsuit include Marc Jacoby; Kara Owens; Cornerstone Solutions Florida LLC; Let the Voters Decide, LLC; and Standing Up for Florida, Inc., a political committee backed by the Seminoles.
As of late Friday afternoon, the state Division of Elections had received 287,101 valid petition signatures for the casino initiative. Florida Voters in Charge needs to submit 891,589 by the Feb. 1 deadline.
Dara Kam reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Trending Stories
- 1Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 2The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 3Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 4For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 5As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250