Federal Judge Weighs Long-Running Pregame Prayer Dispute
Jesse Panuccio, an attorney representing Cambridge Christian School of Tampa, argued that the Florida High School Athletic Association displayed "viewpoint discrimination and arbitrariness" by preventing a prayer from being read over a loudspeaker before a football game.
December 22, 2021 at 12:33 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge heard arguments in a more than five-year legal battle over whether the Florida High School Athletic Association violated a Christian school's free-speech rights by preventing a prayer from being read over a loudspeaker before a football game.
The case stems from the 2015 class 2A state championship game in Orlando's Camping World Stadium between Cambridge Christian School of Tampa, which filed the lawsuit, and Jacksonville's University Christian School.
U.S. District Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell in 2017 dismissed the case, rejecting Cambridge Christian's arguments that blocking the prayer was a violation of the First Amendment. But in 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit overturned Honeywell's ruling, sending the case back to the Tampa-based district court.
Jesse Panuccio, an attorney representing Cambridge Christian, argued during Tuesday's hearing before Honeywell that the FHSAA displayed "viewpoint discrimination and arbitrariness" in its decision to block the prayer from being read over the stadium's public address system.
Part of the Christian school's argument is that the FHSAA allowed a pre-game prayer over the loudspeaker at a 2012 state championship at the same stadium.
"There are two data points, two times that schools requested to pray at the class 2A championship game. And in 50% of them, the FHSAA approved the request. That is arbitrary application," Panuccio said.
The FHSAA, however, said in a motion for summary judgment that it is a "state actor" that hosted the championship game in a publicly owned stadium and that speech over loudspeakers at such events is tightly controlled.
The athletic association contended that speech over loudspeakers at its events is considered "government speech" and that messages or prayers — or "private speech" — could be construed as being endorsed by the FHSAA.
In a motion for summary judgement filed in April, Cambridge Christian's attorneys argued the athletic association has no written policy prohibiting prayers being read over a loudspeaker. Cambridge Christian also contended that the FHSAA has previously written messages of a religious nature on its various social media accounts.
In addition, Panuccio pointed to the FHSAA allowing "secular invocations" such as moments of silence.
"One example is this one, this was following the terrible tragedy at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in 2018, after which the association rightly asked the crowd to, quote, 'Join together in mourning,' with a 20- to 30-second moment of silent reflection and to provide, quote, 'positive thoughts.' The FHSAA did this at every single championship match in every sport in the winter and spring of 2018," Panuccio said.
Judith Mercier, an attorney representing the athletic association, said the tribute to lives lost in the Parkland school shooting was "the FHSAA's speech" and was different from allowing religious speech from individuals or schools.
"The First Amendment does not prevent the FHSAA from asking people to kind of recognize the horrific tragedy at one of their member schools where a number of people died. The FHSAA isn't muzzled to be able to say something like that or prevented from saying that unless they opened it up to other people to say what they want," Mercier said.
Honeywell did not give a specific date for when she will issue an order. She said a backlog of criminal cases that were delayed by COVID-19 will push back the release of her order by at least 30 days.
Ryan Dailey reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Law Firms Brace for Category 5 Hurricane Milton
These Florida Courts Are Closing Amid Category 4 Hurricane Milton
$25M Award: Jury Finds Hospital Negligent After Patient Raped
The 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
9 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250