Judge Clears Way for Lawsuit Over FIU Fees During the Pandemic
Judge William Thomas wrote that the students suing Florida International University "adequately plead the existence of an express contract between themselves and FIU," in part by producing proof that they paid fees associated with services that weren't provided by the school.
January 04, 2022 at 10:35 AM
3 minute read
A Miami-Dade County circuit judge has refused to dismiss a lawsuit against Florida International University that seeks refunds of fees collected from students when the school's campus was shut down in 2020 because of the coronavirus pandemic.
Judge William Thomas, in a 23-page order Thursday, also certified the lawsuit as a class action.
He wrote that students suing the university "adequately plead the existence of an express contract between themselves and FIU," in part by producing proof that they paid fees associated with services that weren't provided by the school.
The students argued that the university breached contracts when it did not deliver the services.
The lawsuit, filed in April 2021 on behalf of students who attended FIU during the spring, summer and fall of 2020, alleged that the students paid fees such as an "athletic fee," a "health fee" and a "transportation access fee."
"Despite substantially reducing or eliminating the services and access to facilities funded by the fees during these semesters, FIU continued to charge students each fee and has not reimbursed students for the portion of their spring 2020 fees that are attributable to the time when the campuses were closed, nor for the amounts that students paid during the remaining semesters in 2020," Thomas wrote in the order.
Thomas also said in the order that if students did not pay fees, "they could be subject to penalties such as academic suspension, withholding of student records and transcripts, and additional fees if sent to collections."
Adam Moskowitz, an attorney representing the students, said in a statement Monday that the lawsuit aims to recover more than $10 million collected from FIU students. Moskowitz also pointed to 12 other class-action lawsuits filed in Florida because of schools refusing to reimburse fees.
In October, an Alachua County circuit judge refused to dismiss a lawsuit that contended the University of Florida should refund fees to students who were forced to learn remotely during 2020.
Attorneys representing UF appealed the decision in November to the First District Court of Appeal, arguing that the university should be shielded from the lawsuit by "sovereign immunity," which helps protect government agencies in legal disputes.
FIU used a similar argument in its attempt to get the Miami-Dade lawsuit dismissed.
Moskowitz in his statement Monday urged the state university system's Board of Governors to issue refunds to all university students who paid fees during the 2020 academic year, rather than fight the lawsuit.
"Hopefully, the volunteers on our State Board of Governors will now follow many other states and simply refund students all of these stolen charges, instead of spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on defense law firms," Moskowitz said.
Ryan Dailey reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250