Florida Senators Back Incentives for Entertainment Industry
Sen. Joe Gruters' proposal would create the Targeted High Wage Production Program, providing tax credits up to $2 million for projects that provide "high returns" on investment and economic benefits to the state.
January 11, 2022 at 12:51 PM
4 minute read
Tax credits of up to $2 million for film, television and digital media productions drew support from senators as part of an effort to make Florida more attractive to the entertainment industry.
But as in the past, the 9-1 vote by the Senate Commerce and Tourism Committee came after opposition from the conservative group Americans for Prosperity Florida, which maintains the issue is "corporate welfare."
The proposal (SB 946) by Sen. Joe Gruters, R-Sarasota, would create the Targeted High Wage Production Program, providing tax credits up to $2 million for projects that provide "high returns" on investment and economic benefits to the state. Backers hope to make Florida more attractive than other states for productions.
"We don't have to compete dollar for dollar, but we have to give them something," said Gruters, who doubles as chairman of the Republican Party of Florida. "And the goal of mine over the last couple years is trying to find a product that we can land and that we could generate some business."
John Lux, executive director of Film Florida, said a funding program doesn't need to be as lucrative or aggressive as other states because Florida is a low tax state with a diverse array of locations that already has a strong production infrastructure.
"There's never been more content available to viewers, which means there's never been more private money available to make that content," Lux said. "Content creators are looking for places to produce and spend money, and we want to compete for those projects."
Sen. Tom Wright, R-New Smyrna Beach, called the tax credit structure a "great way to protect our investments because they get it after the completion."
"We have films being produced around the country that make you believe that they're coming out of Florida, when they're not," Wright said.
However, Americans for Prosperity-Florida Policy Director Phillip Suderman questioned the "poor return" on investment and pointed to an earlier entertainment-incentive program.
"The previous program, which was allowed to sunset in 2016, only got 43 cents in return revenue for every dollar the state spent," Suderman said. "And a 2018 report by the [Legislature's] Office of Economic and Demographic Research showed the Florida entertainment industry financial-incentive program generator generated a return on investment of only 18 cents."
A Senate staff analysis of the proposal said entertainment incentives have waned in popularity, with 31 states in 2018 offering some form of incentives, down from 44 in 2009. However, Georgia remains one of the most generous, with a "tax credit program at the level of demand by placing no cap on tax credits that can be earned."
Florida has done little to fight neighboring states for entertainment productions since the Legislature in 2010 allotted $296 million for film and television work.
That money was quickly designated to 351 projects out of nearly 700 applicants.
A 2019 report from Tallahassee-based Florida TaxWatch estimated that, without a program, the state in the prior four years had lost more than 60 major film and television projects.
A nearly identical proposal last year, sponsored by Gruters and Rep. Dana Trabulsy, R-Fort Pierce, died after drawing support from one Senate committee.
Trabulsy is again sponsoring the measure (HB 217) in the House, where it awaits an appearance before the Tourism, Infrastructure & Energy Subcommittee. The annual legislative session starts Tuesday.
The goal of the Gruters proposal is to "broaden the entertainment industry's impact, enhance tourism, and encourage more family-friendly productions" in Florida, according to a Senate staff analysis of the proposal.
The program would be placed under the Commissioner of Film and Entertainment within the Department of Economic Opportunity.
To qualify, a film production would have to spend at least $1.5 million, while a television show would have to spend at least $500,000 per episode. At least 60% of crew members would have to come from Florida, and at least 70% of the production schedule would have to take place in Florida.
Other requirements include agreeing to promote Florida tourism as part of the marketing effort, placement of a "Filmed in Florida" or "Produced in Florida" logo in the end credits, and allowing the state's film commissioner to visit the production site with at least two guests.
Jim Turner reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
Wachtell Helps Miami Dolphins Secure One of NFL’s First Private Equity Deals
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 2Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
- 3Foreign-Company Lobbyists Would Need to Register Under Proposed DOJ Regulation
- 4'Fancy Dress': ERISA Claim Accuses Plan Administrator and Cigna Affiliates of Co-Pay Maximizer Scheme
- 5The American Lawyer's Top Stories of 2024
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250