A Miami first-party property insurance ruling involving a homeowner accused of lying about making a prior similar damage claim has been reversed at the Third District Court of Appeal, which found her omission to be unintentional.
It’s a case that relies heavily on the interpretation of an insurance policy’s concealment or fraud provision, which results in the forfeiture of coverage if the insured makes false statements relating to the insurance.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
