Florida Proposal Aimed at Investment in Vehicle Charging Stations
Sen. Keith Perry said the proposal seeks to create a "fair, open competitive market" and will face some changes, but it won't block utilities from ongoing efforts to operate charging stations.
January 19, 2022 at 01:57 PM
3 minute read
A proposal that would direct Florida utility regulators to encourage private investment in electric-vehicle charging stations got backing from a Senate committee, despite a concern that it might be beyond the regulators' jurisdiction.
The proposal (SB 920), which cleared the Senate Regulated Industries Committee, comes as some major electric utilities have gotten into the charging-station game.
Bill sponsor Keith Perry, R-Gainesville, said the proposal seeks to create a "fair, open competitive market" and will face some changes, but it won't block utilities from ongoing efforts to operate charging stations.
"I think by opening this up and making sure that everybody has a seat at the table, make it a competitive, free market-based enterprise system, have the [Public Service Commission] oversee that from certain rulemaking, that we'll get ahead of this," Perry said. "We could set the trends for the nation really. We can do this, but we have to be proactive."
Perry's bill would direct the Public Service Commission to propose rules by the end of this year that would offer a "competitively neutral" manner of creating electric-vehicle charging infrastructure, which includes reasonable and affordable electric rates for utilities. The commission would have until Jan. 1, 2024, to adopt the rules.
But a Senate staff analysis of the bill said the Public Service Commission is unclear how it can "prioritize and encourage private investment, or stimulate competition and customer choice in a market that is outside of its jurisdiction."
The analysis also said, in part, that there could be a financial impact on utilities if existing electric-vehicle infrastructure would have to be removed from the rate base or provided through separate, unregulated corporate affiliates.
Utilities have become increasingly involved in charging-station issues as the numbers of electric vehicles have increased. CleanEnergy.Org reported in December that sales of electric vehicles in Florida increased 53% — to 3% of all cars sold — from July 2020 to July 2021.
Last April, Tampa Electric got Public Service Commission approval to spend up to $2 million to purchase, install, own and maintain 200 charging stations.
In December 2020, Florida Power & Light was given the green light for a five-year pilot program intended to add "fast charging' stations that included the utility being able to charge 30 cents per kilowatt hour for motorists who charge vehicles at utility-owned sites.
In 2021, the commission agreed to allow Duke Energy Florida to establish a permanent electric-vehicle program as part of a rate-case settlement that will see $62.9 million spent over the next three years that includes continuing to run existing charging stations from a pilot program.
The Senate proposal has support from the Florida Retail Federation and the Florida Petroleum Marketers Association. Lobbyists for those groups have expressed a need to do away with any advantage utilities might now have through charging-station plans that have already been approved by the commission.
Lawmakers in the 2020 legislative session directed the Florida Department of Transportation to develop a plan that encourages the expansion of charging stations along the state highway system.
The state later designated $8.6 million to add 34 fast-charging stations along Interstate 95, Interstate 4, Interstate 75, Interstate 275 and Interstate 295 as part of $166 million Florida received as its share of a $14.7 billion settlement between Volkswagen and the U.S. Department of Justice over emissions violations.
An identical proposal to Perry's (HB 737) by Rep. David Borrero, R-Sweetwater, is awaiting action in House committees.
Jim Turner reports for the News Service of Florida.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecurities Claims Against Lilium N.V. for Electric Plane Production Delays Fail to Take Flight, Federal Judge Holds
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250