Florida Senate Passes Scaled-Back Emergency Fund
"I believe this number still meets the goals of the bill and that we also ensure that there is flexibility and accountability in the course of an emergency," Senate bill sponsor Danny Burgess said of the $500 million amount.
January 20, 2022 at 09:25 AM
4 minute read
State and Local GovernmentThe Florida Senate on Wednesday cut in half the amount of money it would put into a new emergency fund that critics called a "blank check" for Gov. Ron DeSantis.
The Senate overwhelmingly approved two bills (SB 96 and SB 98) that would shift $500 million of general revenue into the pot of money that the governor could tap during declared states of emergency over the next four years. The Senate initially had considered putting $1 billion into the pot.
Meanwhile, a House committee moved forward with its version of the proposal, which would provide $1 billion that DeSantis could use at his discretion. The House and Senate would ultimately have to agree on any final amount.
The idea for the fund came after the state's response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Senate bill sponsor Danny Burgess, R-Zephyrhills, said the decision to reduce the proposed amount from $1 billion to $500 million was based on bipartisan concerns about the higher amount during an Appropriations Committee meeting last week.
"I believe this number still meets the goals of the bill and that we also ensure that there is flexibility and accountability in the course of an emergency," Burgess said of the $500 million amount.
Sen. Gary Farmer, a Lighthouse Democrat who voted against both Senate bills, called the proposed fund a "blank check" for DeSantis even with the lower amount.
"He's got the ability already to take some monies that are appropriated for emergency services and spend them as he chooses," Farmer said. "This adds a half a billion dollars to that, with no accountability."
Burgess said the state anticipates that money spent from the fund would be reimbursed by the federal government, similar to the way current spending is recouped after declared states of emergency.
Any additional funding on top of the $500 million would require the governor to seek approval from the Joint Legislative Budget Commission, made up of House and Senate members.
The commission has long had authority to make mid-year budget changes and act on spending requests from the executive branch, though it does not meet frequently.
Supporters of the new fund say it would allow the governor to move more quickly during emergencies without having to wait for the legislative panel to convene.
Sen. Aaron Bean, a Fernandina Beach Republican who serves on the legislative commission, said the revised Senate measure returns power to the Legislature.
"We empower our governor whoever he or she is. We know something bad could happen," Bean said. "And there's enough resources to start the recovery, the mission to save Floridians or recovery, or whatever that is. But then you've got the LBC (Legislative Budget Commission) backup."
Earlier Wednesday in party-line votes, the House Pandemics & Public Emergencies Committee approved a pair of bills (PCB PPE 22-01 and PCB PPE 22-02) that were similar to the Senate bills — other than the $1 billion funding amount.
Lawmakers approved an emergency-fund proposal last year, but DeSantis vetoed it after questions were raised about using federal stimulus dollars for the fund.
House Democrats argued this year's proposal fails to place limits on what constitutes an emergency and how money could be spent.
"We should be able to put some guardrails under what the governor can declare as a disaster. We should be able to put some guardrails in terms of having legislative review," Rep. Fentrice Driskell, D-Tampa, said. "Again, I don't consider the Legislature to be red tape. I think we've set up a system of checks and balances to make sure that we as a legislature are appropriating funds, and that we're not just giving the governor, whoever may be the governor in the future, a blank check."
Rep. Mike Caruso, R-Delray Beach, disagreed.
"The act specifically authorizes the governor to use all resources of the state, state government, county governments and municipalities as he sees fit in coping with an emergency as defined," Caruso said. "So, setting aside $1 billion at this time for immediate access by the governor under a state of emergency just seems like a reasonable and prudent thing to do."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCOVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Year-End Tax Planning: How Real Estate Investors Can Leverage Qualified Opportunity Funds
5 minute read'Horror of Horrors': Florida Judges Spar Over En Banc Review in Binance Ruling
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Remembering Ted Olson
- 2Support Magistrates: Statutorily Significant
- 3Nelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
- 4Immunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
- 5Monday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250